You asked. So here are my thoughts on how osteopathic medical students should respond to the NBOME.

(thread)

Look, even before the Step 2 CS cancellation, my DMs and email were flooded with messages from osteopathic medical students who are fed up with the NBOME.

There is *real* anger toward this organization. Honestly, more than I even heard about from MD students and the NBME.
The question is, will that sentiment translate into action?

Amorphous anger on social media is easy to ignore. But if that anger gets channeled into organized efforts to facilitate change, then improvements are possible.
This much should be clear: begging the NBOME to reconsider their Level 2-PE exam is a waste of your time.

Best case scenario, you’ll get another “town hall” meeting, a handful of platitudes, and some thoughtful beard stroking before being told that they’re keeping the exam.
Instead of complaining to the NBOME, here are a few things that are more likely to bring about real change.
1) Vote with your wallets: take USMLE Step 3.

Almost all states allow DO licensure by completing the USMLE series. If you aren’t required to engage with the NBOME, don’t.
2) Lobby the state boards that don’t allow the USMLE.

As an MD who has passed the USMLE, I could practice in any state. Why shouldn’t a DO who passed the USMLE be able to do the same?

(State boards that prop up the NBOME with a COMLEX requirement are listed in the Tweet below.) https://t.co/stace4lMjD
If you intend to practice in one of these states, talk to your state representative. Explain how the medical board is providing a deterrent to DOs serving patients in their state.

The board may be friendly with the NBOME, but they’re still accountable to the legislature.
3) Lobby the AOA to change the COCA accreditation requirements that compel schools to require COMLEX-USA.

It’s ultimately the COCA requirement that keeps the NBOME in business.
The AOA is the professional body ultimately responsible for securing the success of the osteopathic profession.

They should think carefully about whether, at this point in history, a “separate but equal” licensing exam hurts DOs more than it helps.

https://t.co/pFwaAx01oB
As a sidenote:

The LCME’s accreditation standards for MD schools are more stringent than COCA’s for COMs - and even they never mandated the USMLE.

(Still, most schools did - since the requirement gave access to student loans to cover registration fees).

Let the schools decide.
Last thing:

Don’t feel guilty about pursuing these tactics. None of them are underhanded. Market forces and political action are how things are supposed to work in America - and they’ll be needed to move an entrenched, monopolistic bureaucracy that ignores its constituents.

More from Education

Last month I presented seven sentences in seven different languages, all written in a form of the Chinese-character script. The challenge was to identify the languages and, if possible, provide a


Here again are those seven sentences:

1) 他的剑从船上掉到河里去
2) 於世𡗉番𧡊哭唭𢆥尼歲㐌外四𨑮
3) 入良沙寢矣見昆腳烏伊四是良羅
4) 佢而家喺邊喥呀
5) 夜久毛多都伊豆毛夜幣賀岐都麻碁微爾夜幣賀岐都久流曾能夜幣賀岐袁
6) 其劍自舟中墜於水
7) 今天愛晚特語兔吃二魚佛午飯

Six of those seven sentences are historically attested. One is not: I invented #7. I’m going to dive into an exploration of that seventh sentence in today’s thread.

Sentence #7 is an English-language sentence written sinographically — that is, using graphs that originate in the Chinese script. I didn’t do this for fun (even though it is fun), or as a proposal for a new way to write


I did it as a thought experiment. Why? Because thinking about how the modern Chinese script might be adapted to write modern English can give us valuable insights into historical instances of script borrowing, like those that took place centuries ago in Japan, Korea, and Vietnam.

You May Also Like