Categories Culture
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
WW84 is that type of white feminist movie where a white man from Jim Crow-era segregation is the best man humanity has ever known but the Arab men are fanatic bigots desiring a border wall and Latino men are wife beaters & megalomonics. I’m stunned at how racist it was.
The movie was weirdly obsessed with Arabs and Muslims. Probably worse than Iron Man 1. That was a uh... bold choice.
For reference
Wait I also forgot they put this terrible loc-wig on an Indian actor and said he was a descendent of Mayans loooool. This movie was an 80 movies in the most 80 ways possible : terrible stereotyping and casting
(Hilariously the movie was co-written by Geoff Johns, an Arab American)
The movie was weirdly obsessed with Arabs and Muslims. Probably worse than Iron Man 1. That was a uh... bold choice.
For reference
oh................ oh.......... oh NO pic.twitter.com/0CpiEjjM9I
— josh lewis (@thejoshl) December 26, 2020
Wait I also forgot they put this terrible loc-wig on an Indian actor and said he was a descendent of Mayans loooool. This movie was an 80 movies in the most 80 ways possible : terrible stereotyping and casting
(Hilariously the movie was co-written by Geoff Johns, an Arab American)
THREAD: One of the questions that professional writers end up thinking about a lot, but that doesn't quite get enough attention, is a simple one:
"Where does your script live?"
Wanted to get into why this question is so important -- and the two separate parts to it. 1/
[Your Mileage May Vary / Parental Advisory Warning Goes Here] /2
The idea for this thread sprang from a tweet that @nevslin put out there: /3
People like @MuseZack, @bryanedwardhill, and myself encouraged Zack to write the "A Quiet Place-Esque thriller with a Sixth Sense level twist." As Zack put it: /4
And as @bryanedwardhill pointed out:
"Where does your script live?"
Wanted to get into why this question is so important -- and the two separate parts to it. 1/
[Your Mileage May Vary / Parental Advisory Warning Goes Here] /2
The idea for this thread sprang from a tweet that @nevslin put out there: /3
What should I write next? A Quiet Place-esque thriller with a Sixth Sense level twist or a comedic re-imagining of a Greek myth? (Both features.)
— Noah Evslin \U0001f4fa\U0001f39e\U0001f58a (@nevslin) December 16, 2020
People like @MuseZack, @bryanedwardhill, and myself encouraged Zack to write the "A Quiet Place-Esque thriller with a Sixth Sense level twist." As Zack put it: /4
If it's got a great hook, the former has a better chance of selling.
— Zack Stentz (@MuseZack) December 16, 2020
And as @bryanedwardhill pointed out:
I think about it like this. The first idea could be made by a LOT of different filmmakers, with varying levels of celebrity stars.
— Hilluminati (@bryanedwardhill) December 16, 2020
The second? A shorter list on both accounts so much harder to put together. You\u2019d need an 800 lb gorilla directing AND major A-list talent acting.
How do you write a PAP in practice, especially in limited time?
Regardless of how you feel about @The_JOP’s new policy, a lot of political scientists will be writing PAPs for the first time.
I wanted to share my experiences/thoughts having written many PAPs.
Thread follows..🧵
1. What counts as a PAP? In my view, all that makes a PAP a PAP is that it pre-specifies procedures for data analysis, ideally as precisely as possible.
Note what this does *not* include: lit review, theory, etc.
Some people like to write PAPs that include all this, but...
..I do not think this is necessary. In my view, as long as your PAP pre-specifies procedures for data analysis, it’s a PAP, regardless of what else you may want to add to it. Add more if you want, but you don’t need to imo.
That means PAPs can be super short/fast to write.
2. How do you do this practically?
Idea 1: For people getting started, I highly recommend https://t.co/EbxOOIHr8Z. Screenshot attached. You’ll answer 6 questions about your analysis, each answer requires ~a few sentences. Should take you around 15 minutes. And that’s it!
The tool will create a) an anonymized PDF with your answers you can upload with a paper submission and b) a blinded link (eg https://t.co/hTHH0rb4wg) you can include that verifies you pre-registered. And you’re done!
There’s many more options. Here’s two more things I’ve done:
Regardless of how you feel about @The_JOP’s new policy, a lot of political scientists will be writing PAPs for the first time.
I wanted to share my experiences/thoughts having written many PAPs.
Thread follows..🧵
1. What counts as a PAP? In my view, all that makes a PAP a PAP is that it pre-specifies procedures for data analysis, ideally as precisely as possible.
Note what this does *not* include: lit review, theory, etc.
Some people like to write PAPs that include all this, but...
..I do not think this is necessary. In my view, as long as your PAP pre-specifies procedures for data analysis, it’s a PAP, regardless of what else you may want to add to it. Add more if you want, but you don’t need to imo.
That means PAPs can be super short/fast to write.
2. How do you do this practically?
Idea 1: For people getting started, I highly recommend https://t.co/EbxOOIHr8Z. Screenshot attached. You’ll answer 6 questions about your analysis, each answer requires ~a few sentences. Should take you around 15 minutes. And that’s it!
The tool will create a) an anonymized PDF with your answers you can upload with a paper submission and b) a blinded link (eg https://t.co/hTHH0rb4wg) you can include that verifies you pre-registered. And you’re done!
There’s many more options. Here’s two more things I’ve done:
🔔 #2021Dyl_MCharts - WEEK 2! 🎵
✨ A quick summary of audience of tracks, artists and labels included in the thread below.
✨ Based on tracks released between Jan 11 and Jan 17.
🔧 Date of data collection: Today (Jan 25) #EDM https://t.co/0ht0GAIiVl
- Week 2 | Personal favorites -
✨ Aspyer - Symphony [STMPD]
✨ Mo Falk - I'm Back [HEXAGON]
✨ Julian Jordan - Big Bad Bass [STMPD]
- Week 2 | Tracks | YouTube Views -
🥇 Aspyer - Symphony [STMPD] (91.5k views)
🥈 TYNAN, Ace Aura - Stay [Monstercat] (74.2k views)
🥉 Julian Jordan - Big Bad Bass [STMPD] (62.5 views)
- In 2021 | Tracks | YouTube Views -
🥇 Arlow & Shiah Maisel - 21 [NCS] (811k views)
🥈 Castion - Banger Machine [NCS] (701k views)
🥉 deadmau5 & Wolfgang Gartner - Channel 43 [mau5trap] (575k views)
- Week 2 | Tracks | (Plays, Unique Supports) -
🥇 Mo Falk - I'm Back [HEXAGON] (29x, 27x)
🥈 "Symphony" & "Big Bad Bass" [STMPD] (24x, 22x)
🥉 TYNAN, Ace Aura - Stay [Monstercat] (9x, 4x)
✨ A quick summary of audience of tracks, artists and labels included in the thread below.
✨ Based on tracks released between Jan 11 and Jan 17.
🔧 Date of data collection: Today (Jan 25) #EDM https://t.co/0ht0GAIiVl
\U0001f3a72021 Music's selection - A thread \U0001f39a
— Dyl_M (@Dyl_M_DJ) January 7, 2021
(mostly electronic music, cause you know, greatest tracks are electronic tracks \U0001f643)
- Week 2 | Personal favorites -
✨ Aspyer - Symphony [STMPD]
✨ Mo Falk - I'm Back [HEXAGON]
✨ Julian Jordan - Big Bad Bass [STMPD]
- Week 2 | Tracks | YouTube Views -
🥇 Aspyer - Symphony [STMPD] (91.5k views)
🥈 TYNAN, Ace Aura - Stay [Monstercat] (74.2k views)
🥉 Julian Jordan - Big Bad Bass [STMPD] (62.5 views)
- In 2021 | Tracks | YouTube Views -
🥇 Arlow & Shiah Maisel - 21 [NCS] (811k views)
🥈 Castion - Banger Machine [NCS] (701k views)
🥉 deadmau5 & Wolfgang Gartner - Channel 43 [mau5trap] (575k views)
- Week 2 | Tracks | (Plays, Unique Supports) -
🥇 Mo Falk - I'm Back [HEXAGON] (29x, 27x)
🥈 "Symphony" & "Big Bad Bass" [STMPD] (24x, 22x)
🥉 TYNAN, Ace Aura - Stay [Monstercat] (9x, 4x)