I read things, you see?
I read a lot of things. I know how rapidly everything can change. When I see you try to declare "they're just not regularly around women and don't know them" I mock you and will continue to do so. Because you have no idea what's happened.

Kant never really got around to being near women.

Did he hate them?
Yet there are contradictions and I've noticed that where they are seemingly present, rumination is a normal behavior.
That'll drive you insane. I would know.

While I've learned to see it and let go of nearly all of it after the fact I don't think most people understand that almost none of it is real.
Rumination is like a miniature psychosis that normal people can suffer and induce. That's what it's like.
Well, that's what it's like if there was no need for the repetition as much as conditions. Normally it's almost instantaneous. But that's pretty close and something I think most people could understand.
You ever ruminated over something? Alone. For a long time. More and more rapidly reliving the situation as it compounds until the emotional reaction it gets from you was as if it were the greatest destruction and insult ever laid on you.
Maybe later on once it's all settled and you're back to normal, you look at what you felt and it just seems fucking insane afterwards. It made no sense,
you were acting waaaaaaaaaay out of proportion for what it was and it turns out, the perceived thing in something that upset you so much, never actually happened, you just perceived it being that negative way.
Like when you hear someone say something just out of earshot and imagine it hostile and about you.
If schizophrenia is the warping of the thing, psychosis is the warping of the context and it's seemingly very important that that's actually something even normally healthy people can and often do.
You know, I read once that Iranian have a "holiday" where they basically intensely remember history and slights to the country over and over again all day. Basically engaging in a holiday of rumination.
Seemed strange but useful.

More from Polina

More from Culture

. THREAD 1/x

David Baddiel is getting lots of coverage and feedback on his book which again focuses on so called 'left wing' antisemitism.

I will start by saying that I have seen antisemitic comments made by Labour members and some genuine cases.

However, I have huge concerns.


2/x

Let's look in detail at this article written in April 2019 in the @Guardian - and I will explain the concerns.

The areas highlighted guide you to believe this was all Labour - IT WASN'T.

It also occurred before 2015! Detail follows...

https://t.co/cK59FP83aG


3/x

So as you see the writer of this rather deceitful piece starts with

"THAT CHANGED IN SEPTEMBER 2015" 🙄

This was done to point the timeframe as Corbyn's leadership. Yet the article goes on to describe things that are not even related to Labour, which occurred in 2014.


4/x

So... What in fact the @Guardian writer is discussing here is this case - where a group of Neo-Nazi's spent months inflicting abuse on Jewish MP Luciana Berger

All the detail is in the Court Notes when Bonehill-Paine was sentenced by the judge.

https://t.co/wAyo6Yro5Q


5/x

The Justice sentencing remarks to Neo-Nazi explain the previous cases too. See the date 2014.

Yet the Guardian writer refers to this NON LABOUR case to effectively make her article a lie.

"Star of David" - this was Garron Helm another neo-Nazi..

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".