@tyler @Blockstream @rogerkver Long reply, please do not start replying until I say *end*. — I’m always happy to discuss. Problem is that nothing ever comes from it. You only want to talk “ethos”. Facts are simple: Blocksize increase or not. Non mining full nodes have virtually zero benefit. Proven ad nauseum.

@adam3us @tyler @Blockstream @rogerkver Once we establish the fact that non-mining full nudes are not required, which I have discussed with you for years (and you still fail to recognize), we can talk about the effects you caused and will cause by refusing to increase the blocksize limit. https://t.co/tRW6FAC6GZ
@adam3us @tyler @Blockstream @rogerkver Ridiculous transaction fees: - Noone will use Bitcoin as a currency for payments. Those who did, ditched it (Steam, etc). Bitcoin is a P2P electronic cash system (title of whitepaper), not just a atore of value. - People now have to resort to using centralized exchanges.
@adam3us @tyler @Blockstream @rogerkver - Bitcoin was designed to simply and easily increase the blocksize limit. It was actually 1 line in the code and was absurdly easily changed (compared to Segwit, dont get me started). Satoshi put the limit in place as a temporary fix for a ddos issue (prove me wrong, I was there)
@adam3us @tyler @Blockstream @rogerkver - You and a couple of co-conspirators wanted the limit to stay in place. From Blockstreams business perspective, that makes total sense. From an end-useds perspective, you screwed everyone. I fought and convinced miners/companies to remove the limit. They agreed. You stopped it.
@adam3us @tyler @Blockstream @rogerkver What you fail to realize, is that Bitcoin needs massive tx’s at low fees to survive long term. While the price has been able to sustain it for now, block rewards will dry up. I predict you will be forced to create inflation if you want miners to stay https://t.co/wV9HUmMVqF
@adam3us @tyler @Blockstream @rogerkver We also all predicted that Lightning was going to fail and it has been an ongoing joke “ready in 2016”. You have the perfect, and absolutely necessary solution right in front of you: Increase the damn block size limit! You have zero valid excuses to not do so.
@adam3us @tyler @Blockstream @rogerkver Removing blocksize limit: - Immediately destroys all “Bitcoin” competition (bch, bsv, etc). - Will probably have all the OG’s come back - Will enable Bitcoin as a proper internet currency again, in a true P2P fashion. - Will secure Bitcoin’s long term future (miner fee security).
@adam3us @tyler @Blockstream @rogerkver If you fail to do so, then - Bitcoin will remain a simple “store of value” without underlying utility. It will eventually be overtaken by something superior (first mover advantage doesnt last). - You will be forced to create inflation or similar to ensure Bitcoin’s security.
@adam3us @tyler @Blockstream @rogerkver - You will defeat Bitcoin’s primary purpose which is to give the world a decentralized P2P electronic cash system. In closing, I want to add that me and many others are not maximalists and never will be. We want decentralized currencies to flourish. We don’t care which one. *end*

More from Crypto

1/9 #BSC Daily from


2/9 #BSC Daily from

You May Also Like

https://t.co/6cRR2B3jBE
Viruses and other pathogens are often studied as stand-alone entities, despite that, in nature, they mostly live in multispecies associations called biofilms—both externally and within the host.

https://t.co/FBfXhUrH5d


Microorganisms in biofilms are enclosed by an extracellular matrix that confers protection and improves survival. Previous studies have shown that viruses can secondarily colonize preexisting biofilms, and viral biofilms have also been described.


...we raise the perspective that CoVs can persistently infect bats due to their association with biofilm structures. This phenomenon potentially provides an optimal environment for nonpathogenic & well-adapted viruses to interact with the host, as well as for viral recombination.


Biofilms can also enhance virion viability in extracellular environments, such as on fomites and in aquatic sediments, allowing viral persistence and dissemination.
First thread of the year because I have time during MCO. As requested, a thread on the gods and spirits of Malay folk religion. Some are indigenous, some are of Indian origin, some have Islamic


Before I begin, it might be worth explaining the Malay conception of the spirit world. At its deepest level, Malay religious belief is animist. All living beings and even certain objects are said to have a soul. Natural phenomena are either controlled by or personified as spirits

Although these beings had to be respected, not all of them were powerful enough to be considered gods. Offerings would be made to the spirits that had greater influence on human life. Spells and incantations would invoke their


Two known examples of such elemental spirits that had god-like status are Raja Angin (king of the wind) and Mambang Tali Arus (spirit of river currents). There were undoubtedly many more which have been lost to time

Contact with ancient India brought the influence of Hinduism and Buddhism to SEA. What we now call Hinduism similarly developed in India out of native animism and the more formal Vedic tradition. This can be seen in the multitude of sacred animals and location-specific Hindu gods