Thread:

While the entire US crypto industry (exchanges, funds, associations, PsPs, lobbyists, etc) is currently focused on fighting the AML rules proposed by FinCEN, the XRP Community has been left ALONE fighting the securities battle FOR THE BENEFIT of the whole industry.

1/

The entire US crypto industry (excluding the XRP Community) has been miserably failing to acknowledge that, until now, all the SEC has had for purposes of characterising a blockchain-based token as a security under the Securities Act of 1933 ...

2/
... is a 75 year-old judicial precedent (i.e. 1946 Howey Test), and some non-binding internal guidance. That's it. Nothing more. No clear federal regulations and no clear binding precedents.

3/
Should the SEC definitively win the Complaint filed against Ripple, it would gain a contemporary (and *binding*) judicial precedent essentially defending the posture that it is rightful to apply a 75 year-old precedent to 2020's cutting edge technology, ...

4/
... giving the SEC's enforcement division a clear path moving forward within the crypto industry.

With such precedent (which the SEC hasn't been able to obtain so far, as a result of the early settlements reached with other crypto projects), the SEC would be ...

5/
... ultimately legitimized to go after every other crypto project whose characteristics could eventually fall under the prongs of a 75 year-old Test, i.e. probably all cryptocurrencies excluding Bitcoin and maybe Ether.

6/
This would eventually force all the US crypto industry participants to reduce the scope of their business models to only two digital assets, therefore limiting available revenue channels and freedom to innovate with new technological tools.

7/
However, the US crypto doesn't seem to care about that, and will rather go as far as throwing a single project under the bus (despite the destructive consequences potentially deriving from it), in an attempt to short-sightedly mitigate ...

8/
... a 'supposed' risk of being charged with liabilities associated with facilitating the sale of unregistered securities that haven't actually been definitively classified as such.

9/
The US crypto participants have failed to properly assess risks and have failed to identify the current aspects of the market that could derive, in the long-term, to material adverse effects in prejudice of their own businesses.

End.

10/10

More from Crypto

Michael Pettis @michaelxpettis argues that it is not always obvious who (China or the U.S.) adjusts best to "turbulent changes."
Bitcoin answers that question.
Thread:


World economies currently suffer four major redistribution challenges:
The most important is increasing government stealth use of the monetary system to confiscate assets from productive actors.
/2

That process is exacerbated by "Cantillon Effect" transfers to interest groups close to government ("the entitled class," public sector workers, the medical industrial complex, academia, etc....), which is destroying much of that wealth /3

The shadow nature (see Keynes) of government inflation makes the process unidentifiable, un-addressable and undemocratic.
The biggest victims (America's poorly educated young) are unequipped to counter generational confiscation tactics of today's wily senior beneficiaries. /4

Government control of the numéraire in key economic statistics (GDP, inflation, etc...) makes it impossible for economic actors to measure progress and liabilities. /5

You May Also Like