#CNXIT -26770
Weekly chart. https://t.co/YVjvgZIy0Y
#CNXIT
— Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) \u092e\u0948\u0902Schedule Tribe) (@idineshptl) May 26, 2022
Weekly chart.
Minor pullback before further downside.
Respecting #Fibonacci retracement level 0.382%#Probability pic.twitter.com/y2JvoIikDI
More from Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) मैंSchedule Tribe)
More from Cnxitlongterm
What happened to IEX can happen to CNXIT. Savdhaan rahe, satark rahe. Reiterating it again, every falling wedge/channel, RSI divergence is not a reversal signal.
#CNXIT
#CNXIT
Watching the marked zone to be tested. If it doesn't cross it, then most probably a parabolic downmove towards 24k. That would lead to even large caps cracking just like Small and Midcaps. #CNXIT https://t.co/FxbzP5vlBr pic.twitter.com/FSqcSqTQM9
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) June 21, 2022
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".