How to Find Multibagger Stocks

How to create screeners and use them

How to read charts 🧵🧵

A thread of all my Threads

Kindly Re-Tweet to help others 🙏

1) How to find #Stocks for Short Term Momentum

https://t.co/ie53a2K05S
2) Important Scanners for Stock Selection

https://t.co/eLNomYk2qq
3) How to Create Screeners on Chart Ink

https://t.co/NiFdZIXppM
4) Here are the 10 Candlestick patterns you must know

https://t.co/gLcg7aFXGg
5) Intraday Trading Tips 🧵🧵

https://t.co/unbuaZUfOv
6) Learnings from Bear Market

https://t.co/BL8zCYWJ7a
7) Tips to secure your Account -

https://t.co/CzmWEulrvI
8) Follow my Handle @myfirststock99 as I post learnings every weekend

Don't miss the telegram too -

https://t.co/i2GEoB7pS2

More from My First Stock

More from Catagory trading

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?