We had a conversation on the podcast about the racialization of dog breeds, where we talked to @BronwenDickey, the author of Pitbull: The Battle Over an American Icon.

In the 1930s, Pitbulls — which, as Bronwen pointed out to me over and over, don’t constitute a dog breed but a shape — used to be seen as the trusty sidekick of the proletariat, the Honda Civic of canines. (Think of “the Little Rascals” dog.)
.
That began changing in the postwar years and the rise of the suburbs. A pedigreed dog became a status symbol for the burgeoning white middle class. And pitbulls got left behind in the cities.
Aside: USians have flitted between different “dangerous” breeds and media-fueled panics around specific dogs. (anti-German xenophobia in the late 1800s fueled extermination programs of the spitz, a little German dog that newspapers said was vicious and spread disease.)
Some previously “dangerous” dogs get rebranded over the years — German shepherds, Dobermans, Rottweilers. But the thing their respective periods of contempt and concern had to do is that they were associated with some contemporarily undesirable group.
But as pitbulls became more associated with cities their image as “dangerous” has remained — antiblackness being far stickier than anti-German sentiment, obvs.

There are far more news stories about pitbull attacks, which has led to a belief that pitbulls are especially violent.
There are also myths like the idea that pitbulls have jaws that lock and once they bite into you they can’t let go. (That’s...not true.)
We actually don’t know which dogs attack most — Bronwen said that bites from larger dog types are more likely to be *reported* to authorities and obviously more likely to require treatment.
Pitbulls are also so ubiquitous that any big-headed mutt involved in an incident can be transmuted into a pit in the reporting/recollection.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but the stigma attached to pitbulls is all very “superpredator.” And that’s not coincidental.
(One thing that really threw me after i talked to Bronwen was the extent to which there is a whole anti-pitbull Twitter universe out there — and their tweets really, really do have that Thin Blue Line/“Immigrants are rapists” energy. They say she’s doing pitbull propaganda.)
The material consequences of this stuff for Black and Latino people are huge: plenty of apartment buildings ban “pitbull-type dogs,” and since pitbulls are a shape, not a breed, it leaves a lot of discretion to landlords and building managers.
You know where I’m going with this: #housingsegregationineverything

It’s not hard to find people talking about imposing pitbull bans on their communities because the dogs “bring the wrong element.”

Denver JUST repealed their ban after 3 decades.

https://t.co/fFcT6IgA58
(What else was happening in US cities 3 decades ago?)
another guest we had on the episode studied people’s perceptions of dogs by breed.

The “whitest” dog — in terms of the level of goodwill shown by the white respondents to his survey?

Labrador retriever.
There’s a reason you see labs in ads and TV shows. And it’s not unrelated to race.
One last thing: that researcher also found that people were more likely to see a dog as a pitbull if that dog was with a Black person.

More from Book

One can make an analysis of how many right wing groups published books before Modi in power and after Modi in power.

Would Akhilesh Mishra, Abhinav Prakash and many others have got a chance to write in an English daily before?

The VC of JNU, IIAS, Nehru center, RRML are all


Right wingers.

This, while some in our own fold were criticizing and backstabbing an excellent book (disagreeable in places) by Harsh Madhusudhan and Rajeev Mantri.

There have been at least 4 lit fests and think tanks developed by right wing in six years. Pondy and +

Mangalore are the prime of them.

There are more media channels and more anchors in neutral channels backing the government then those against in six years.

We have at least three big lawyers: Harish Salve, Mahesh Jethmalani and Mukul Rahotgi fighting cases. We have won

more legal battles than not and are able to get many things done that would look impossible just two years ago.

Yes, textbooks, deregulation, harrasment and cabalism of the left including tech suppression and killing spree of fascistic governments remain and everything is not

a bed of roses. But what was a bed of roses for the opposition is not a bed of roses for them too.
Udhav would have loved to see Republic closed. It hasn't.. Mamata would love to have killed the whose who in BJP - Not possible.. She would not like big wigs of TMC join BJP - Not

You May Also Like

https://t.co/6cRR2B3jBE
Viruses and other pathogens are often studied as stand-alone entities, despite that, in nature, they mostly live in multispecies associations called biofilms—both externally and within the host.

https://t.co/FBfXhUrH5d


Microorganisms in biofilms are enclosed by an extracellular matrix that confers protection and improves survival. Previous studies have shown that viruses can secondarily colonize preexisting biofilms, and viral biofilms have also been described.


...we raise the perspective that CoVs can persistently infect bats due to their association with biofilm structures. This phenomenon potentially provides an optimal environment for nonpathogenic & well-adapted viruses to interact with the host, as well as for viral recombination.


Biofilms can also enhance virion viability in extracellular environments, such as on fomites and in aquatic sediments, allowing viral persistence and dissemination.