More from RealRLD
The Road to 2021 Thread.
https://t.co/dSznB4Wg46
@scientificecon @jbhearn @wesfree @financialeyes @JoeBlob20 @GrubStreetJorno @wiki_ballot @Pathos14658352
https://t.co/GvExaHUoqS
@scientificecon @jbhearn @wesfree @financialeyes @JoeBlob20 @GrubStreetJorno @wiki_ballot @Pathos14658352
https://t.co/RS3RcYEgsH
@scientificecon @jbhearn @wesfree @financialeyes @JoeBlob20 @GrubStreetJorno @wiki_ballot @Pathos14658352
https://t.co/Z8vYbaC5Cu
@scientificecon @jbhearn @wesfree @financialeyes @JoeBlob20 @GrubStreetJorno @wiki_ballot @Pathos14658352
#CovidStroika #CovidPurpose #GreatReset #GFC11
https://t.co/gUb9OX7AdL https://t.co/qqXCutbKK1
https://t.co/3D4TpmeXZr #CovidStroika @jbhearn @scientificecon @JoeBlob20 @financialeyes @Lloyd__Evans @wiki_ballot @GrubStreetJorno
Night has fallen only for those who have let themselves fall into the night. For
those who are living, [says Heraclitus], "helios neos eph’hemerei estin"– the sun is
new each day.
"in effect, all business sagacity reduces itself in the last analysis to judicious use of sabotage."
Veblen (1917) An Inquiry .. Nature of Peace, &.. Perpetuation, p. 168
#CovidStroika @jbhearn @scientificecon @JoeBlob20 @financialeyes @Lloyd__Evans @wiki_ballot @GrubStreetJorno
https://t.co/OtstKx9heK #CovidStroika
@jbhearn @scientificecon @JoeBlob20 @financialeyes @Lloyd__Evans @wiki_ballot @GrubStreetJorno JOURNAL OF INTEGRAL THEORY AND PRACTICE. NOTES FOR CONTEXTUAL SEARCH ENGINE OFFERING INTEGRAL FRAMEWORK PERSPECTIVES. GRUB STREET JOURNAL NOTE 1.
#Moduloft The Concept. #Cop26 Draft No.1 Presentation and discussion #BuildBackBetter #LevellingUp
https://t.co/83Lcp66ySk
#Moduloft #AffordableHousingFinance #TheBestMove
Affordable Homes, Are we Looking for a Solution? If so heres where to look!
https://t.co/TFmLjdJWF8 via @yumpu_com Affordable Homes, Are we Looking for a Solution? If so heres where to look! #Moduloft #AffordableHousingFinance #TheBestMove
https://t.co/YUGr2H0HGl
Affordable Homes, Are we Looking for a Solution? If so heres where to look! #Moduloft #AffordableHousingFinance #TheBestMove
https://t.co/qhAB3TOQHo
Affordable Homes, Are we Looking for a Solution? If so heres where to look! #Moduloft #AffordableHousingFinance #TheBestMove
More from Bitcoin
claim: bitcoin ownership is heavily concentrated.
@business published an article claiming "2% of accounts control 95% of all Bitcoin" 🤣
truth: the facts, my friends, simple don't line up. let's dive in!
2/ interrogating on-chain addresses is tricky.
address =/ account.
one person can control multiple addresses.
one address can hold bitcoin belonging to multiple ppl.
exchanges and trading firms will have addresses with large balances that represent client funds.
3/ the fine folks @glassnode published an excellent analysis of on-chain address balances in January
the ownership distribution of bitcoin among wallets is actually much more diverse than one might expect.
full piece here:
https://t.co/n5IdIQdNoA
4/ 31% of BTC is held in addresses not identified as exchange wallets.
these are likely institutions, funds, custodians, and OTC desks.
our analysis at @CoinSharesCo indicates >15% of all bitcoin is held in third party custody, including @coinbase and our own @KomainuCustody
5/ in fact, between asset managers @Grayscale ($36B in BTC) and our @xbtprovider ($4B in BTC), 4% of bitcoin is locked up by fund providers and asset managers!
our @CoinSharesCo research team publishes an EXCELLENT weekly report on fund flows and AUMs -
1. China PlusToken FUD: Old news. Please see linked thread.
2. U.S. Treasury FUD: Read thread below...
$BTC:
— David Puell (@kenoshaking) November 27, 2020
1/ So here's the deal with all the PlusToken news we've been seeing recently in the crypto media. Thing is, tho it's just being reported now after the Chinese government put out official balances, @ErgoBTC blew this story open for the on-chain community over a year ago... https://t.co/epNjZaNcJ1
1/ These news are much more relevant, as they imply severe trade-offs for people who want to keep their bitcoins undoxxed, with the cost and risks of doing so. I would not disqualify the tweet as mere FUD in the sense that what he posted is false. It should be taken seriously.
2/ For all we know, his decision of making it public before TG weekend may come out of the urgency of informing CT of a poignant anti-Bitcoin move by a Trump administration trying to cut lose ends before leaving office—not just "price manipulation" as I've seen suggested around.
3/ It implies the acceleration of a process already planned for for months in advance, not something he just came up with to "crash the market."
4/ In practicality, assuming this passes, it will have two major consencuences:
a. Armstrong's analysis is correct. And I would go further in saying, this regulation would leave the U.S. severely handicapped to continue to be the leader in the cryptocurrency industry worldwide.
#BTC https://t.co/Yd4iZqC42s
I don't know why Crypto YouTubers are so bullish on BTC right from the top \U0001f61b while the charts are saying something else. Won't be surprised to see the entire retracement of the marked rise. #BTC pic.twitter.com/SQJkjAfZme
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) April 30, 2022
You May Also Like
🗓 Release date: October 30, 2018
📝 New Emojis: 158
https://t.co/bx8XjhiCiB
New in iOS 12.1: 🥰 Smiling Face With 3 Hearts https://t.co/6eajdvueip
New in iOS 12.1: 🥵 Hot Face https://t.co/jhTv1elltB
New in iOS 12.1: 🥶 Cold Face https://t.co/EIjyl6yZrF
New in iOS 12.1: 🥳 Partying Face https://t.co/p8FDNEQ3LJ
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?