1/ Thread explains the rationale for $GBTC over #bitcoin. (Speaking from experience, but not necessarily an endorsement of GBTC):

2/ $GBTC fills a need and is designed to permit exposure to #bitcoin for professional, registered investment advisors in the US. Money managers have unique circumstances compared to individual investors.
3/ #Imagine you are an investment mgr with 250 client accounts (an average-sized separate account manager would have 400). Owning #bitcoin means setting up another 250 accounts - major work with not a lot of reward. If you want to rebalance (stocks/bonds/bitcoin)...
4/ you have 250 transfers to make. Doubles admin workload, makes operational life very complicated. Lots of work for a 5-10% allocation (or less!) to $BTC.
5/ Client reporting is a nightmare. 2 sets of custodian statements not easily combined... A typical client already has 3 accounts, now it is 6 accounts & 6 statements, and there are few software feeds to consolidate data from #crypto exchanges into traditional portfolio reports.
6/ Tax advantages: $GBTC can be held in an IRA, tax deferred. Over long run, you get most of the $BTC return with far less tax liability, usually a net positive.
7/ Regulatory simplicity: some state and federal regulators hate #bitcoin. They can halt an investment advisor's operations on that basis, or at least make life hell. $GBTC is a stock. Regulators may not like it but if advisor is within the law there is nothing they can do.
5/ So for a registered investment advisor, $GBTC is a #bitcoin wrapped in equity, which makes it equity. This solves lots of problems and creates some benefits in a financial industry that is not yet aligned (operationally and regulation-wise) to accommodate BTC.
6/ And that is why investors pay a premium for $GBTC too. It greatly simplifies holding #bitcoin in a traditional portfolio. Don't knock GBTC - anything which facilitates adoption is good for bitcoin. GBTC allows exposure to BTC that would not otherwise exist.
7/ If you're an entrepreneur, there are many opportunities also: for example, a data feed from #crypto and stock brokers that did consolidated reporting: advisors would love this, you could make bank. Also...
8/ a low-cost competitor to https://t.co/KL1iFmiXDf would also be a help. Lots of money to be made in that space ($ billions), especially as boomers transfer their retirement wealth to GenX/GenY.

More from Bitcoin

$BTC views

Price needs to let volatility wear off before its next big move. Thinking 30K-40K range for the next 1-2 weeks. Then either 50K straight or after piercing 30K and bouncing back above 30K within 1-2 days.


$27500-$27000 is the key area. If price heads back down to 30K, expect 30K to be breached, fall to that area, and bounce back. FAST. All very fast.


What do I do with this information?

Simple.

I'm trading the range against a core position. Buying when price pushes lower, selling when higher. It's like playing the achordeon. There's always air left inside.

Where exactly?

Nowhere.

I don't use limits for that. $BTC is liquid enough to trade at market without issues.

I'm watching PA, volume and rates for buying and euphoria as reflected in rates for reducing.

Decision making is dynamic. Nothing is set in stone. But most likely if price heads back down to 30K 'll be holding off next time. The gameplan is to have ammo to buy the dip (to redeploy). If 30K breaks absolutely no buying until down to 27Ks or back above 30K.
I have a different take on bitcoin, tether, and dollars

Can also speak with authority on nation state violence

"Nothing makes you feel more free than taking another person's freedom"


and @profplum99 concerns with tether, bitcoin, and decentralization make sense yet I remain long BTC

They are correct on force, I worked in decentralized societies, they are dangerous because the state does not have a monopoly on violence

For those in the first world who have never seen a milita ride out of the desert, kill and enslave farmers, and the government cannot stop it because the 21st century slave trade pays better than the UN, the reality of decentralization is might equals right

I know, that isn't the decentralized future Buterin talks about while wearing a t-shirt with a cat fighting space invaders on it (love those shirts)

But we need to be real, disrupting the global centralized economy won't be like Uber putting taxis out of work

It will be war and faminine level disruption as old empires come alive again

For decentralization to rise the centralized global power of the last 70 years (US Hegemony) has to weaken

Yes we will be rich, but as the Big Short says,

"you can be happy, just don't fucking dance"

You May Also Like