Have you ever heard the names of these young freedom fighters, all aged between 21 and 25, who were tried and executed by the British? If not, don’t be sad: you’re one of 99.999% citizens of Bharat who don’t.
Thread follows soon.

These brave soldiers were from the 4th Madras Coastal Defence
Battery of the British Army and were among a dozen 'rebels' arrested on April 18, 1943, on charges of “acting against the Government and obstructing and/or adversely affecting the war efforts”.
The British intelligence got news that these soldiers were planning “sabotage, incendiarism wherever
possible, tampering with the loyalty of the forces by trying to
cause desertions and encouraging tensions and rivalries amongst
soldiers housed in army barracks.”
A Court-Martial was held on July 6 and August 5, 1943, in
the St. Andrews Church, Bangalore, where all the accused were
convicted and the nine Bengali young soldiers were sentenced to death. Two were sentenced to transportation for life, one to
seven years' rigorous imprisonment.
They marched from their cells to the gallows in pairs, gave full -throated shouts of Bande Mataram, embraced each other with hearty smiles and gave up their lives on September 27, 1943, like heroes on the battlefields.
Their execution was held in Chennai as Mysore state refused to allow it in their state territory. This is the story of the 1943 army revolt, which has long disappeared from the pages of our history. Fortunately a few authors have recorded their sacrifices in their books.
The Madras rebellion was the first organised rebellion in the British Indian army. The court martial of those involved preceded INA trials by three years. But no famous congress lawyer came to their defence. Because for Cong, it was more important for Britain to win the war.

More from All

You May Also Like

Funny, before the election I recall lefties muttering the caravan must have been a Trump setup because it made the open borders crowd look so bad. Why would the pro-migrant crowd engineer a crisis that played into Trump's hands? THIS is why. THESE are the "optics" they wanted.


This media manipulation effort was inspired by the success of the "kids in cages" freakout, a 100% Stalinist propaganda drive that required people to forget about Obama putting migrant children in cells. It worked, so now they want pics of Trump "gassing children on the border."

There's a heavy air of Pallywood around the whole thing as well. If the Palestinians can stage huge theatrical performances of victimhood with the willing cooperation of Western media, why shouldn't the migrant caravan organizers expect the same?

It's business as usual for Anarchy, Inc. - the worldwide shredding of national sovereignty to increase the power of transnational organizations and left-wing ideology. Many in the media are true believers. Others just cannot resist the narrative of "change" and "social justice."

The product sold by Anarchy, Inc. is victimhood. It always boils down to the same formula: once the existing order can be painted as oppressors and children as their victims, chaos wins and order loses. Look at the lefties shrieking in unison about "Trump gassing children" today.
A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.