#Sita_Navami

जनकसुता जगजननी जानकी | अतिशय प्रिय करुनानिधान की ||

Shri Sita Ji's poojan and satsang on the holy day of her divine incarnation. Sita Navami is celebrated on the ninth day of shukla paksha of Vaishaka month every year, today is day when Mata Sita was born.

1/n

Janak putri devi Sita, who was the incarnation of Goddess Lakshmi, has had proved that having strong and sincere love towards one is the ultimate.

2/n
Devi's life has established a set of rules for today's women, her dedication towards Bhagwan Ram, her sacrifices towards state, her life of independence, her efforts, love and affection towards her children is what we seek.

4/n
A strange truth is that #Ram_Navami is celebrated by everyone and Sita Navami is forgotten. Ram Navami's greetings will be given to you by every leader, media house but none would wish on Sita Navami.

5/n
On the occasion of Goddess Sita Navami, Team TCV wishes you and your family happiness and harmony.

🙏

#TheChargedVoice

More from All

@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".