A tough battle with the authorities resulted in taking down this video.
My Notes on Democracy Part 1
MANUFACTURING Dl55ENT AND MODI'S RESPONSE - AN ANALYSIS
DlS5ENT is allowed in a democracy. Any democratic leader or government will uphold - and MUST uphold its citizens's right to DlS5ENT.
This thread analyses the recent Indian experience.
A tough battle with the authorities resulted in taking down this video.
Most of you may have noticed Modi as a potential PM in the last decade.
Who are these people and what is their connection to the topic?
Almost all 'isms' are products of C'sm.
Reason: volatile groups like these when divided can be ruled over easier than a bunch of Dharmics or pagans who question them.
We will now analyse the current problem. DI5SENT.
It has 3 stages as shown above
1. Weakening the TARGET Government (Manmohan Singh)
2. Mass MobiIisati0n - protests
3. VioIent Ri0ts
Behind a weak PM, many vile plans were executed without the public ever knowing.
NGOs mushroomed, pink R++
As you all know, C0ngress is C'st party with a different name. They have been on a socialist path since Nehru's times, but have become aggressively so in SoGa times. Everyone knows her connections with the obvious.
https://t.co/C8MkNJsP0e
This made the C0MMUNl5T5 to step up their game and use their second technique.
We are all very familiar with these.
All the anti-CAA pr0tests, Bangalore Ri0ts, Delhi Ri0ts - we see a heightened frequency in the last two years, especially after Modi's win in 2019.
But the real enemy is hidden.
This is when the revoI'n comes to fulfilment.
I am not suggesting this will happen, but it's no thanks to the C0ngress.
However, many are still very hidden from public view.
We see all the usual factors in it.
It's very clear that this is a C'st Dl5SENT. A war so to say. In this war, we lose if we do not identify the real enemy and train our aim at the 'VlCTlM' group they place.
I hear many people saying he is NOT taking action. That's not true. When citizens 'Dl5SENT', a government has to allow it. It's not a democracy otherwise. Besides, using their
Modi government opposed in court each time and argued such pr0tests should not be allowed. In a democracy, this is the limit for a government.
DlS5ENT is allowed, but anyone violating law is booked, disabled
C0MMUNlSM thrives only in places were Dl5SENT is curbed. It weakens in open democracies like India.
India is a civilisational state, not a nation state. The attack on its psyche and this taunting of its heritage
Work is underway to rewrite history so that we can reverse this subversi0n.
We must continue to be a diverse nation, not too much mind conditioning or social engineering.
But that doesn't mean as citizens we simply play a game without knowing its rules of engagement.
The reason for this thread is the disproportionate time we spent on discussing a clear plot by the C'sts - playing into their hands. When the Farmer Pr0tests started, I requested everyone to ignore it.
More from Sreevidya Balasubramaniam
More from All
You May Also Like
I think a plausible explanation is that whatever Corbyn says or does, his critics will denounce - no matter how much hypocrisy it necessitates.
Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel
He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:
He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:
He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party
One of the oddest features of the Labour tax row is how raising allowances, which the media allowed the LDs to describe as progressive (in spite of evidence to contrary) through the coalition years, is now seen by everyone as very right wing
— Tom Clark (@prospect_clark) November 2, 2018
Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel
He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:
He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:
He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party