Exit krna sekhlo agle bull run ke liye, jisse ke same mistakes repeat na ho !!
Har stock turn down hota hai ! Exiting helps beating markets & catching new ones
Without rules you cannot conquer markets !
— EquiAlpha -MidTerm Momentum\U0001f40e\U0001f40e (@equialpha) May 3, 2022
These are my 9 sell warriors to conquer markets !
Selling is the toughest part..Some or the other sell rule always get me out !
Learn fully - https://t.co/iDlVff5KoU pic.twitter.com/u2vQvpGzEs
More from EquiAlpha -MidTerm Momentum🐎🐎
This is why I bought Zota Healthcare📜
> Super high buying pressure already up 140% in last 8 weeks + Volume activity
Funda - Co is in super speed opening DavaIndia generic medicine stores in south India
Details in chart below👇
Up 10% today 🚀
RT if you like the analysis ⚡️ https://t.co/hK0ZBLE6Bz
> Super high buying pressure already up 140% in last 8 weeks + Volume activity
Funda - Co is in super speed opening DavaIndia generic medicine stores in south India
Details in chart below👇
Up 10% today 🚀
RT if you like the analysis ⚡️ https://t.co/hK0ZBLE6Bz
Only zota healthcare \U0001f680\U0001f680\U0001f680\U0001f40e
— EquiAlpha -MidTerm Momentum\U0001f40e\U0001f40e (@equialpha) August 31, 2021
Masterstroke \U0001f4a5\U0001f4a5\U0001f4a5 pic.twitter.com/hnH22mtUJN
As I said yesterday, I will be sharing the some of my screeners in this thread 🐎
Please note Screener will help you to reach momentum but you need to see chart & further segregate trends manually (1/n)
Do retweet & like so that it reaches maximum people
Screener 1) +ve ADX DMI Breakout to find out where the action is going on a particular day, you can then look onto stocks and find setups and patterns to trade.
Link - https://t.co/fIKlWSloNw
(1/4)
Screener 2) Going one level more deep into ADX where we find up stocks which are already in trend on weekly
1) Weekly ADX >25 indicating the trend is already there
2) +DMI breaking out
3) Stock within 15% of 52w high
4) Stock above 200 SMA
Link-
Screener 3) This is based out of within 20% of ATH Stocks. I have also added few fundamentals to it. You can change variables according to it
Link -
Screener 4) RSI which is a momentum indicator
RSI breaking out can give you names where momentum is picking up and then you can look onto charts for buy points
Link -
Please note Screener will help you to reach momentum but you need to see chart & further segregate trends manually (1/n)
Do retweet & like so that it reaches maximum people
Screener 1) +ve ADX DMI Breakout to find out where the action is going on a particular day, you can then look onto stocks and find setups and patterns to trade.
Link - https://t.co/fIKlWSloNw
(1/4)
Screener 2) Going one level more deep into ADX where we find up stocks which are already in trend on weekly
1) Weekly ADX >25 indicating the trend is already there
2) +DMI breaking out
3) Stock within 15% of 52w high
4) Stock above 200 SMA
Link-
Screener 3) This is based out of within 20% of ATH Stocks. I have also added few fundamentals to it. You can change variables according to it
Link -
Screener 4) RSI which is a momentum indicator
RSI breaking out can give you names where momentum is picking up and then you can look onto charts for buy points
Link -
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x