IMHO, this article — https://t.co/wLiWDOZrvm — is an important corrective to fatalism about the new strain. As in, "welp, there are probably already at least a handful of cases of the new strain already here, so no matter what we do now, it's gonna spread." Not necessarily so.
"10 to 20 percent of infected people may be responsible for...80 to 90 percent of transmission."
"An early run of bad [or good!] luck...can produce dramatically different outcomes."
New Zealand had 277 separate introductions; only 19% of them led to more than 1 additional case.
That's all referring to the original COVID strain, but I haven't read anything suggesting that the same pattern doesn't apply to the new variant. Not sure if we know yet, but it's at least possible a lot of people don't spread it (while the few that do, spread it *A LOT* a lot).
Here's what we know, or think we know:
* The new variant is here, with probably at least a handful of undetected cases.
* The new variant is so wildly contagious that, once it gains a foothold, cases WILL spike.
* Cases stopped rising steeply around Nov. 10 (by onset day).
It seems like 1 of 2 things is true:
1) New variant arrived in October or earlier, and helped cause our November spike. We then reined it in, without even realizing it was here.
2) New-variant community spread is low-level thus far, at least thru ~Xmas. No superspreaders yet.