CodyyyGardner Categories India
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
As many of you would have encountered this article filled with lies & bigotry, which is financed by leftist-islamist media blocs including Scroll, wire, Aljazeera etc. The fake exaggeration in numbers of Jammu massacre is deliberately done to dwarf Hindu massacres in J&K in 1947.
So how many muslims died in Jammu massacre?. Article quotes more than 230k but how can dead be more than the population itself. As many still lived in Jammu. Here is the census report of 1941.
And one thing to be Kept in mind is that Jammu district is not Jammu province of 1941 as much of that went to pakistan which was heavily muslim majority and still is.
These Hindu haters deliberately try to confuse this point, so as to support their filthy lies & Bigotry.
Here is excerpt from Pawan Dewans book "Jammu" which has compiled and analysed all sources.
So the count should be less than 17k . Although a tragedy but nothing infront of Hindus who suffered complete annihilation in Mirpur, Rajauri etc.
Even the India Hater Yusuf Saraf has given the figure of 20k in his book "Kashmir a struggle for freedom"
Islamist misquote Snedden who just mention about the rumours of 237k and even mentions it as exaggeration. He literally writes that research is needed on Jammu massacre.
OMG BATTA CAUGHT LYING flat. You cowards would never put your neck on line for Muslims ! Never Ever ! Nehru in PMs seat was aware of HariSingh, RSS and Master Tara Singh colluding to execute the #JammuMassacre. If he wished he could have stopped it ! (1/n)https://t.co/RioRxr8APa
— I am Kashmir ! (@KaeshurCraftsmn) January 4, 2021
So how many muslims died in Jammu massacre?. Article quotes more than 230k but how can dead be more than the population itself. As many still lived in Jammu. Here is the census report of 1941.
And one thing to be Kept in mind is that Jammu district is not Jammu province of 1941 as much of that went to pakistan which was heavily muslim majority and still is.
These Hindu haters deliberately try to confuse this point, so as to support their filthy lies & Bigotry.
Here is excerpt from Pawan Dewans book "Jammu" which has compiled and analysed all sources.
So the count should be less than 17k . Although a tragedy but nothing infront of Hindus who suffered complete annihilation in Mirpur, Rajauri etc.
Even the India Hater Yusuf Saraf has given the figure of 20k in his book "Kashmir a struggle for freedom"
Islamist misquote Snedden who just mention about the rumours of 237k and even mentions it as exaggeration. He literally writes that research is needed on Jammu massacre.
when your idea of India is rooted Hindutva, no Hindu is anti-national. if your idea of India is rooted in humanity, no person would be anti-national - nationalism is *an infantile disease* (Einstein), *cruel epidemic of evil that is sweeping over the human world* (Tagore)
people from times immemorial have used religion for its spiritual valence - radical, progressive political leaders have used theology & spirituality to advocate emancipatory politics rooted in love, universality, look beyond superficial differences that power leverages to divide
every single religion I can think of is rooted in patriarchy & horrors have been perpetrated in its name, words can't capture the shame & barbarity - but until nonreligious spiritualism & morality is widespread, we have to contend with religion, its resonances & internal shifts
danger with leveraging religion instead of religion-agnotic spiritualisms is what you see happening today - absurdly grotesque formations - RSS, Gandhi's own murderers, claiming Gandhi while refashioning his religious spirituality of ahimsa into political religiosity of violence
religion has significant but ultimately limited political value, where someone can use religion to draw on universal values of love, fraternity, morality to advocate for progress, the other can use the exact same language to justify hate, genocide, heterobrahminical patriarchy
Killing Gandhi was an act of patriotism? https://t.co/VIGzUR3GC7
— Subhashini Ali (@SubhashiniAli) January 2, 2021
Shared by Indian Express android app.
Click here to download https://t.co/nNm6OZ9OFs
people from times immemorial have used religion for its spiritual valence - radical, progressive political leaders have used theology & spirituality to advocate emancipatory politics rooted in love, universality, look beyond superficial differences that power leverages to divide
every single religion I can think of is rooted in patriarchy & horrors have been perpetrated in its name, words can't capture the shame & barbarity - but until nonreligious spiritualism & morality is widespread, we have to contend with religion, its resonances & internal shifts
danger with leveraging religion instead of religion-agnotic spiritualisms is what you see happening today - absurdly grotesque formations - RSS, Gandhi's own murderers, claiming Gandhi while refashioning his religious spirituality of ahimsa into political religiosity of violence
religion has significant but ultimately limited political value, where someone can use religion to draw on universal values of love, fraternity, morality to advocate for progress, the other can use the exact same language to justify hate, genocide, heterobrahminical patriarchy
