THREAD: How to choose what to write about.

When you're blocked by the lie of "writer's block."

1. First, where I get ideas from:

• I teach others and rewrite the transcriptions into blog posts.

• I capture real stories I tell over dinner. Vulnerable, authentic experiences.

• I find strong opinions (on Twitter) that I disagree with. My counter-argument becomes a post.
Of these ideas, the BEST is whichever I can't not write about.

Which idea, of all those swimming inside your brain, are you compelled to pursue the way Ahab was driven to hunt Moby Dick?
—Steven Pressfield
Here's the two-step framework for finding your "must write" ideas:
My first step is choosing an objective for my article, such as:
Step two is pairing that objective with what motivates me:
Your objective clarifies what you're trying to accomplish.

Your motivation ensures you actually see it through.

That’s all that's needed to write with conviction: pair an OBJECTIVE with a MOTIVATION.

When writers lack one of these, they tend to not finish their articles.
Part 2. Okay, but what do I say on the topic?

Once I've chosen a topic, my next step is finding what to say.

One of my favorite writing tricks is to only write my introduction then hand it to friends and ask:

"What are the best ideas I could cover in the rest of the post?"
It turns out that a great time to ask for feedback is after completing your introduction.

People give you surprisingly novel ideas that are better than your original ideas.
Specifically, when I get lost writing, here's how I ask for feedback:

I ask several people to rate my intro from 1 to 10 on how interested they are in reading more.

Don't let them choose 7—that's a cop-out.

They have to decide between 6 (meh) or 8-10 (good).
I keep rewriting until I reach an 8 for my target audience.

I don't aim for higher than 8 because ideas are rarely super interesting to everyone.

(I only do this process when I'm struggling.)
A score of 8 validates I've met three ingredients of a great intro:

• It's a compelling hook into my topic. Readers sense they'll get novelty.

• It conveys the importance of my idea so that readers care to hear the rest.

• It's concise.
Amazon uses this same strategy for releasing products!

They start by drafting a fake PR announcement—as if the product were about to launch.

They share the announcement only with employees.

If the employees aren't interested in buying the product, they pause and start over.
They just saved themselves years of misguided work.
Back to the topic of writing. Let's wrap up.

I believe that people ultimately read for novelty and story.

The risk that readers face when reading your work is that they don't learn anything USEFUL or FEEL anything profound.
That's why I use my first draft to find novel ideas.

Novel ideas are typically:

• Counter-intuitive
• Counter-narrative
• Shock and awe
• Elegant articulations
• Make someone "feel seen"
Then I use my second draft to make those novel ideas resonate—via:

• Stories
• Analogies
• Examples

In other words:

Writing Quality = Novelty x Resonance
I post threads 2x/week like this.

If you want more writing content, follow and see past threads here:

@julian

More from Julian Shapiro

More from Writing

SHORT THREAD!

Simple Writing Trick to Avoid Plagiarism when using Templates

This may be useful for anyone but the examples here are more relevant to scholarship applicants

In other words, how to avoid the copy & paste syndrome.

Kindly RT to help others.

The past week brought some concerns about plagiarism in scholarship documents. For example:


Plagiarism is unacceptable at any level in academia and may lead to several undesirable outcomes, including revocation of admission offers or conferred degrees. So here is how you can prevent or rid yourself of the copy&paste syndrome


1. Don't use any template at all.
Just follow the darn instructions, or use helpful tips scattered all over the internet. Worry less about perfection.

I understand this may be hard for less experienced scholars. So if you must use a template, continue with the thread.

2. If possible, find more than one template.

This helps you identify the flow of ideas and the commonalities in the template. You can then develop your own unique document from this knowledge.

If you are still confused and must use a template, continue with the thread

You May Also Like

Ivor Cummins has been wrong (or lying) almost entirely throughout this pandemic and got paid handsomly for it.

He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...


... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:


Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.

Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9


Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."

I wonder why...

Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x


Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.

Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq