\u26a1\ufe0f \u0410\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0435\u044f \u041d\u0430\u0432\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0434 \u0430\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043e\u043c
— \u041a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0430 \u041d\u0430\u0432\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e (@teamnavalny) January 28, 2021
🛑In #Russia, past 24 hrs. Thread: #Putin's terror. Arrests, beatings, tortures, court hearings, & sentences w/o the accused & defenders, raids, intimidation. The court turns down the appeal for #Navalny. Navalny says, "We will not be intimidated." Unprecedented. Please RT. 👇🏽 🛑
\u041a\u043e\u043d\u0444\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0446-\u0437\u0430\u043b, \u0433\u0434\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442 \u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043b\u044f\u0446\u0438\u044f \u0437\u0430\u0441\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f: pic.twitter.com/Hycz5h4RIU
— \u041a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0430 \u041d\u0430\u0432\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e (@teamnavalny) January 28, 2021
\u041e\u0431\u044b\u0441\u043a \u0443 \u043c\u043e\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u043e\u0436\u0438\u043b\u044b\u0445 \u0440\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u0439, \u0441 \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u043c\u0438 \u044f \u043d\u0435 \u0436\u0438\u0432\u0443 \u0443\u0436\u0435 8 \u043b\u0435\u0442. \u041f\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0446\u0435\u0439\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u043b\u043e\u043c\u044f\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0432 \u043a\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0440\u0443, \u043c\u0430\u043c\u0430 \u043f\u044b\u0442\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0441\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0445 \u0434\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0435\u0437\u0434\u0430 \u0430\u0434\u0432\u043e\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0430.
— \u041a\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0442\u0438\u043d \u042f\u043d\u043a\u0430\u0443\u0441\u043a\u0430\u0441 (@jankauskas_k) January 28, 2021
\u0423 \u043c\u043e\u0435\u0439 \u043a\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0440\u044b \u0441\u043e\u0442\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0438, \u044d\u0448\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u0438 \u043a\u0430\u043a\u0438\u0435-\u0442\u043e \u0447\u0443\u0432\u0430\u043a\u0438 \u0432 \u0431\u0430\u043b\u0430\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0445. \u0425\u043e\u0442\u044f\u0442 \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0432\u0438\u0434\u0438\u043c\u043e
— \u041d\u0430\u0441\u0442\u044f \u041a\u0430\u0434\u0435\u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430 (@kadetovaa_) January 28, 2021
\u041a \u042e\u0440\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0443 \u0424\u0411\u041a \u0410\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0435\u044e \u041c\u043e\u043b\u043e\u043a\u043e\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0443, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0439 \u0441\u0435\u0439\u0447\u0430\u0441 \u043f\u043e \u0433\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0438\u0441\u043a\u0443 \u0432 \u041b\u044e\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043d\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043c \u0440\u0430\u0439\u043e\u043d\u043d\u043e\u043c \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0449\u0430\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u043f\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430 (\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0439 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0441\u044f \u0432 \u0410\u043b\u044c\u044f\u043d\u0441 \u0432\u0440\u0430\u0447\u0435\u0439), \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0448\u043b\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u044f\u043c\u043e \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0435\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u0441\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043b\u044e\u0434\u0438 \u0432 \u0431\u0430\u043b\u0430\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0445 (\u0424\u0421\u0411) \u043f\u043e \u0430\u0434\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0434\u0435\u043b\u0443 \u0437\u0430 \u0430\u043a\u0446\u0438\u044e \u0432\u043e \u0412\u043d\u0443\u043a\u043e\u0432\u043e. pic.twitter.com/lpKnrQTttk
— Ivan Zhdanov (@ioannZH) January 28, 2021
\u2757\ufe0f\u0421\u0440\u043e\u0447\u043d\u043e, \u0443 \u043d\u0430\u0441 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0430\u043b \u043a\u043e\u043e\u0440\u0434\u0438\u043d\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440 \u0448\u0442\u0430\u0431\u0430 \u0420\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d \u0422\u0440\u0435\u0433\u0443\u0431\u043e\u0432! \u041e\u043d \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0433\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u0432\u044b\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u044c, \u043c\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0435\u043c, \u0433\u0434\u0435 \u043e\u043d.
— \u0428\u0442\u0430\u0431 \u041d\u0430\u0432\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432 \u041d\u0438\u0436\u043d\u0435\u043c \u041d\u043e\u0432\u0433\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0435 (@teamnavalny_nn) January 28, 2021
\u041c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430 \u043d\u043e\u043c\u0435\u0440 8 (831) 268-68-68 \u0438 \u0441\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0438\u0442\u044c, \u0433\u0434\u0435 \u0420\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d. \u042d\u0442\u043e \u043d\u043e\u043c\u0435\u0440 \u0434\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0438\u044f \u0413\u0423 \u041c\u0412\u0414 \u043f\u043e \u041d\u0438\u0436\u0435\u0433\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u043e\u0431\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438.
\u26a1\ufe0f\u26a1\ufe0f\u26a1\ufe0f\u26a1\ufe0f\u041d\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0438\u0435\u0440\u0435\u044f \u0410\u043d\u0434\u0440\u0435\u044f \u0412\u0438\u043d\u0430\u0440\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0437\u0430\u0432\u0435\u043b\u0438 \u0443\u0433\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0434\u0435\u043b\u043e \u043f\u043e \xab\u0434\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043d\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0435\xbb (\u0441\u0442. 212.1 \u0423\u041a \u0420\u0424). \u0421\u0435\u0433\u043e\u0434\u043d\u044f \u0432 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0438 \u0441 \u044d\u0442\u0438\u043c \u0434\u0435\u043b\u043e\u043c \u0431\u0430\u0442\u044e\u0448\u043a\u0430 \u0431\u044b\u043b \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0430\u043d \u043d\u0430 \u043f\u043b\u043e\u0449\u0430\u0434\u0438 \u041b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u043d\u0430. pic.twitter.com/J9lQMcJHVm
— \u0428\u0442\u0430\u0431 \u041d\u0430\u0432\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432 \u0425\u0430\u0431\u0430\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0435 (@teamnavalnykhv) January 28, 2021
\u0412 \u041e\u0440\u043b\u0435 \u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0436\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044f \u043e\u0448\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0444\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u043d\u0430 20 \u0442\u044b\u0441\u044f\u0447 \u0440\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0435\u0439 \u0437\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u0442 \u0432 \u0441\u043e\u0446\u0441\u0435\u0442\u044f\u0445 \u0441 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0437\u044b\u0432\u043e\u043c \u0432\u044b\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430 \u0430\u043a\u0446\u0438\u044e \u0432 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u043a\u0443 \u0410\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0435\u044f \u041d\u0430\u0432\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e 31 \u044f\u043d\u0432\u0430\u0440\u044fhttps://t.co/vlLVWp3Mza
— \u041c\u0411\u0425 \u043c\u0435\u0434\u0438\u0430 (@MBKhMedia) January 28, 2021
More from World
A) If you mean by "legally questionable" either that Senate is barred by constitution from trying an official impeached while in office, or that there are even very strong arguments against it, I have to differ...
Some argue that if the Senate declines to hold a legally questionable, resource-sucking trial, Trump would be getting a free pass. That assumes criminal authorities do nothing and citizens can't be trusted to evaluate. Censure and focus important work?
— Ross Garber (@rossgarber) January 22, 2021
2/10 Constitutional structure, precedent & any fair reading of original intent dictate that argument for jurisdiction is far stronger than argument against. On original intent, see
3/10 If you mean argument against jurisdiction is plausible, sure, it's plausible. It's just weak. In practical fact, Senate can try Trump now, find him guilty & disqualify him from future office if there are sufficient votes. And no court would presume to overturn that result
4/10 b) The argument from resources is awfully hard to take seriously. Fewer than a dozen House members act as Managers for a few weeks. They are staffed, as are Senators hearing case, by folks whose job it is to do stuff like this...
5/10 Yes, Senate floor time will be taken up. But it's past time for us to stop thinking of members of either house as feeble, fluttering, occupants of a nationally-funded convalescent home. There are nearly 500 of these people with 1000s of staff and a bunch of big buildings...
20 academics criticizing an paper is fine; good science, really
10000+ hate mail for studying schools in Sweden is insane
Anonymous docs/ prof (hiding in faceless accts) on twitter smearing researchers is insane
[thread] https://t.co/QYldLD3WO0
Together with @ernkrans, I am interviewed in @bmj_latest: "We need to ensure that our researchers understand the concept and value of academic freedom and the responsibility that comes with it"https://t.co/AFjtbSfgjr
— Ole Petter Ottersen (@ottersenolep) February 18, 2021
In April 2020, @jflier and I saw this coming
We saw increasingly heated and personal attacks against scientists merely for having a range of views on COVID19 (PS there is no playbook/ right ans)
Tying science to naked politics was also bad idea, we
Yet, repeatedly that is what happened. Twitter 'experts' displayed an absolute intolerance to other views
Folks who disagreed weren't just wrong, they were malicious actors spreading "disinformation"
Really? Someone worked for 25 years as faculty to suddenly spread lies?
Disinformation has been so misused that it has lost meaning.
I recently saw an ID doc & lab researcher in the UK be accused of spreading "disinformation"
hahah, get outta here, you are trying to say "i disagree" but your keyboard is broken
Personal attacks have become so bad that I have seen a lab researcher accuse a doctor of wanting to engage in inappropriate relationships with patients due to diverging views on vaccine messaging
Seriously? It was a low point even for twitter
You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x