Wow
— Jim Richards SHOWGR\U0001f399M (@JIMrichards1010) March 15, 2020
This man is the global authority on the spread of disease. If you are a leader (in any capacity) watch this. If you are not, watch it too. pic.twitter.com/bFogaekehM
Here's a thread documenting the epic incompetence of the Trump administration + the GOP in dealing with the pandemic. Some Democratic politicos deserve severe critiques also (Cuomo and DeBlasio being the poster children there) but a national problem requires a national response.
EXCLUSIVE: White House national security officials prepared a \u201cpandemic playbook\u201d \u2014 a step-by-step guide to ensure testing, check on workers\u2019 equipment, even consider the Defense Production Act.
— Dan Diamond (@ddiamond) March 26, 2020
The Trump administration ignored it. https://t.co/tykOlbW5Nh with @nahaltoosi
When the next pandemic occurs (and make no mistake, it will) and the federal government is unable to respond in a coordinated and effective fashion to protect the lives of US citizens and others, this decision by John Bolton and Donald Trump will be why. https://t.co/iMSzopSRaI
— Stephen Schwartz (@AtomicAnalyst) May 10, 2018
Just a reminder, the first confirmed Cornavirus case in the U.S. was on January 20th.
— Nate Lerner (@NathanLerner) March 16, 2020
That's 8 weeks the Trump administration could have spent preparing tests, quarantine plans, respirators for hospitals, and stimulus packages... but chose not to.
.@WhiteHouse repeatedly blocked efforts to legally require masks on airplanes, airports and other transit modes -- and rejected a CDC draft proposal -- even after extensive administration discussions https://t.co/MUuRqJcipu
— davidshepardson (@davidshepardson) January 14, 2021
Day 1 of the Trump administration set the tone for what came next.
— Dan Diamond (@ddiamond) December 31, 2020
Health experts were ignored. Scientists who disagreed with Trump were later pushed out.
As a result\u2014 when COVID arrived, the health agencies were already limping to meet it.https://t.co/Fhxwe3xVAR new, from me
My message to my fellow Americans and friends around the world following this week's attack on the Capitol. pic.twitter.com/blOy35LWJ5
— Arnold (@Schwarzenegger) January 10, 2021
On pandemic response, this GOP governor was well ahead of the curve: https://t.co/iI5onwIL2b
— Jonathan Koomey (@jgkoomey) April 2, 2020
To first order, multiply all COVID death numbers by 1.4 to get a more accurate tally. https://t.co/NeC5aDu5uF
— Jonathan Koomey (@jgkoomey) January 14, 2021
So, I think @Yascha_Mounk article in @TheAtlantic is some ways a needed cry for help, of despair, but it starts to 'both sides' responsibility for the #COVID19 epidemic in the US, which I think is unfortunate and unhelpful. 1/ https://t.co/OTR0UuBT7t
— Gregg Gonsalves (@gregggonsalves) June 14, 2020
More from Trump
Including election fraud.
@JoshJPhilipp of @EpochTimes
Sometimes they tell us . . but we fail to listen carefully . .\U0001f914pic.twitter.com/VpJbZQwhsj
— Lawyerforlaws (@lawyer4laws) December 16, 2020
You May Also Like
One thing I've been noticing about responses to today's column is that many people still don't get how strong the forces behind regional divergence are, and how hard to reverse 1/ https://t.co/Ft2aH1NcQt
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) November 20, 2018
See this thing that @lymanstoneky wrote:
And see this thing that I wrote:
And see this book that @JamesFallows wrote:
And see this other thing that I wrote:
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?