After all the jokes, my serious take:

By the numbers, no person in all of human history has shared a greater number of conspiracy theories with a greater number of people than Donald Trump did through social media.

This pipeline is now cut off, which is a "really big deal."

For our LikeWar book, I actually read every Trump tweet, going back to his first.

The sheer scale of not just the lies and insults in mindnumbing obviously, but he was also notable for just how many conspiracy theories he fed fire too long before presidency.
It hit topics from well known ones like his birtherism to other ones that are even more despicable now like aiding anti-vaxxers. Indeed, on that last one, my worry was that after Biden came in, he would pivot back to that theme, to stoke anger and bring attention back to himself
We argued in book that the path to making the internet less toxic are the superspreaders. IE, just like in public health, instead of trying to police everyone, focus on those key nodes that effect everyone.
Well, the largest superspreader of proven false conspiracy theories in human history is finally unable to operate in the same way.
Won't conspiracy theory continue though online?
Won't more extreme groups now cluster in smaller, tighter nets? etc. etc. Of course.

But in Clausewitzian terms, they face a whole new type of "friction."
Not just Trump's ban, but the larger policy shift to take into account not just rule-breaking but "impact" (IE, evaluating more its effect on people, which was already shifting in particular as part of CV-19 response) alters the playing field.
Everything in the system, from policies to overall algorithmic design was once tilted in the favor of toxic forces.

Imagine a foosball table game where it was tilted. Yes, the little soccer players could trying to stop each rush of the rolling ball, but overall didn't matter.
Over the past year, company policy change by policy change, that table has started to be righted, driven by outside pressure over elections,cv-19, mass killings and internal employee revolts. Is it long after it could and should of been? Absolutely.
And that's why you see the anger at the firms still, because we know a lot could have been avoided. For me, the crystalizing moment was being told years back they couldn't take the steps on far right extremism that they'd already taken on Islamic extremism. Then...
Then only after several more mass killings, what they said was technically and legally impossible, suddenly was possible.
As another writer put it (I think @cwarzel ), its been a bit of "CalvinBall" from Calvin and Hobbes, where they claim there are rules, but also make them up as they go. That's another key source of the anger at the firms among both analysts and the public on this.
But in their defense, that is also understandable. It was a changing (business, technology, and battle) field but making these kind of decisions is not what much of the people in tech firms planned on. They want to build, not police.
So where are we now? Now, they've finally come to the realization that they have a whole new set of responsibilities. I do think, after years of dodging it, they get they are running not just a communications and commerce space, but also a conflict space.
And in that conflict space, by far the most toxic actor just got moved off the board. Again, by the raw numbers, Trump is not just a key node, but literal center of multiple universes of conspiracy theory. And, new policies make it harder for another like him to have same effect
So the events of last few days are going to reverberate well beyond Trump's account or just one topic...
And with that, I should have a coffee to start my day and then tweet rather than vice versa

More from Trump

Today's Twitter threads (a Twitter thread).

Inside: Stop saying "it's not censorship if it's not the government"; Trump's swamp gators find corporate refuge; and more!

Archived at: https://t.co/7JMcAbaULj

#Pluralistic

1/


Monday night, I'll be helping William Gibson launch the paperback edition of his novel AGENCY at a Strand Bookstore videoconference. Come say hi!

https://t.co/k3fvBdqOK0

2/


Stop saying "it's not censorship if it's not the government": I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition.

https://t.co/7I0MpCTez5

3/


Trump's swamp gators find corporate refuge: The Swamped project.

https://t.co/MUJyIOr2iw

4/


#15yrsago A-Hole bill would make a secret technology into the law of the land https://t.co/57bJaM1Byr

#15yrsago Hollywood’s MP loses the election — hit the road, Sam! https://t.co/12ssYpV46B

#15yrsago How William Gibson discovered science fiction https://t.co/MYR0go37nW

5/
Having a Twitter account is not a right.

If you incite violence on Twitter, the company can - and should - stop you. Good call.


Plans for “future armed protests” are spreading on Twitter and elsewhere, the company warned, “including a proposed secondary attack on the US Capitol and state capitol buildings on January 17, 2021”.

Yes, people who boosted their careers off of Trump - his sycophants, his kids & people like Haley, who helped him attack and undermine human rights around the world - are boo-hooing right now.

Always beware of powerful people pretending to be victims.

https://t.co/0A5D5eJFvL


But no one should react with glee. The president of the United States has been inciting violence, and Republican Party leaders, along with a willing, violent mob, have been aiding his attempts to overthrow the democratic process.

That's the real story here.

The dangers are real, and we've all seen them. That Twitter even had to contemplate banning any politician for inciting violence is awful. That they had to ban the sitting president for it is even worse.

You May Also Like

Trading view scanner process -

1 - open trading view in your browser and select stock scanner in left corner down side .

2 - touch the percentage% gain change ( and u can see higest gainer of today)


3. Then, start with 6% gainer to 20% gainer and look charts of everyone in daily Timeframe . (For fno selection u can choose 1% to 4% )

4. Then manually select the stocks which are going to give all time high BO or 52 high BO or already given.

5. U can also select those stocks which are going to give range breakout or already given range BO

6 . If in 15 min chart📊 any stock sustaing near BO zone or after BO then select it on your watchlist

7 . Now next day if any stock show momentum u can take trade in it with RM

This looks very easy & simple but,

U will amazed to see it's result if you follow proper risk management.

I did 4x my capital by trading in only momentum stocks.

I will keep sharing such learning thread 🧵 for you 🙏💞🙏

Keep learning / keep sharing 🙏
@AdityaTodmal