BC TRUMP
Saved by @jacobhtml

You’d think that if Pence could overturn the election like Trump claimed then Biden surely would’ve taken up that chance

 Also this is such a small thing but one thing I noticed in that Trump campaign ad the defense just ran, there were no citations, unlike every clip that the impeachment managers showed
Michael Van Der Veen is giving us the full Fox News Primetime Defense.
PROCESS ARGUMENT.

DRINK.
Lol my guy this is the chance to rebut the evidence that they’ve presented against Trump.
Schoen is saying that “withholding” the new security camera footage was a violation of Trump’s due process rights

BUT the rules say that all the evidence admitted into the record after you’re done has to be seen by both sides beforehand

He’s seen it now. That counts.
Oh. Okay so Schoen is going to argue, as I predicted, that the use of media reports by the prosecution as a lack of evidence

Way to insist that the prosecution call upon witnesses to testify!!

https://t.co/ZMksgGoA0d
Like...is this a bluff? Is Schoen baiting the managers into calling witnesses?

Because he’s saying that the media footage was manipulated and “false representations of tweets”!
Oh my god. We’re really gonna do a “ZOOM ENHANCE!!” right now??

And yes it is a recreation of a tweet because the president got his account nuked!!
IF THE TWEET HAS A TYPO, FROM YOUR MIND YOU MUST WIPE-O
Wait. Wait. Wait. So...your defense. Is to show the parts of Trump’s speech where he issues a veiled threat to members of Congress while directing people to go to the Capitol to fight.
I’m. Screaming.
“The president insisted that there are two sides of the story about white supremacists marching” is a hell of a defense
“The House managers showed video that was cut off the threats against members of Congress who refused to illegally overturn the election for me” is a hell of a defense
“Donald Trump did a lot of things that were impeachable but Democrats didn’t actually impeach him for over the last four years” is a hell of a defense
“Every example of the use of the word ‘fight’ is morally the same” is a hell of a defense
“Elizabeth Warren ran an extremely energetic campaign” is a hell of a defense
“The DNC should honestly pay us for this campaign ad” is a hell of a defense
“We are going to spend literally ten minutes showing Democrats saying the word ‘fight’ but somehow not fomenting angry mobs which only happens when our client says it” is a hell of a defense
“We are going to play the word ‘fight’ Clockwork Orange-style until it no longer sounds like a real word” is a hell of a defense
“People angry over centuries of racial abuse are the exact same as channeling people to attack Congress to overturn the election” is a hell of a defense
“What about the time that Joe Biden and every member of the Senate agreed that there was no way to overturn electoral votes in 2017” is a hell of a defense
“Democrats correctly insisted that electronic voting machines should have paper trails” is a hell of a defense
“Inspiring an attack on Congress is the exact same as Bill Clinton’s impeachment” is a hell of an argument
“Can you believe that the Democrats would say that Congress’s ability to speak freely on the floor doesn’t apply to Trump speaking at a rally” is a hell of a defense
“We have to ignore that only one side here actually gave a speech that led to an attack on Congress” is a hell of a defense
“We are going to show you another super cut of speeches that did not result in an attack on Congress” is a hell of a defense
“An impeachment trial is actually a law against free speech” is a hell of a defense
“The Constitution has limits on Congress’s impeachment powers that aren’t in the text” is a hell of a defense
“Please ignore the part where he says that no one who violates the constitution and the laws should be secure” is a hell of a defense
“I’m going to conveniently forget that members of Congress aren’t subject to impeachment and have their own protection for speech on the floor of Congress” is a hell of a defense
“Congressional debates are the exact same as Trump lying about the election being stolen” is a hell of a defense
“The House managers didn’t cite Supreme Court cases irrelevant to their argument in their brief” is a hell of a defense
“Trump actually said the word ‘fight’ a lot of times that Democrats didn’t show that involve him encouraging his crowd to overturn the election on Jan. 6 because it was fraudulent” is a hell of a defense
“If a Dem said ‘fight’, Trump can’t incite” is a hell of an argument
“I’m gonna spend my opening remarks self-negging” is a hell of a defense
“There was no insurrection because what happened at the Capitol failed” is a hell of a defense
“The House managers accurately showed how horrific the attack on the Capitol after Trump rallied his supportes and whipped them into a frenzy was” is a hell of a defense
“Please watch this same Trump campaign ad again, you’ll love it just as much this time” is a hell of a defense
“Trump can’t have incited the mob if they were too dumb to understand his speech on Jan. 6 was all about peace and primary elections” is a hell of a defense
“The violence on Jan. 6 was preplanned during the months that the former president, my client, was falsely insisting that the election was stolen and encouraging his supporters to protect him” is a hell of an arguemnt
“It’s impossible my client’s words were misunderstood when after he spoke the crowd then attacked Congress” is a hell of an argument
“My client’s stream of conscious bouncing back and forth between topics means you can’t discern any real meaning in his words” is a hell of a defense
“My client was only encouraging his supporters to throw you out of office if you didn’t overturn the election, so that the next Congress can do just that” is a hell of a defense.
“Trump told people to go home four hours after the Capitol was attacked and only told people to support police after the building was seiged because they’re on our side and not to leave the building” is a hell of a defense
“some of the president’s supporters skipped his speech and were already gathering at the capitol before it began because they knew attacking it was the goal ahead of time” is a hell of a defense
“the preplanned assault on the capitol had nothing to do with the fact that they were in DC because trump invited them and the fact that they were inspired by his rhetoric about the election being stolen” is a hell of a defense
“my client’s threatening phone call to the Georgia Secretary of State trying to get him to overturn the results of the election in the state can’t have been part of his plan to overthrow the election because he didn’t know it was being recorded” is a hell of a defense
“my client’s lies about the election being stolen were totally based in fact, despite no court agreeing with him” is a hell of an argument
“my client’s words sound better when i read them than when playing the tape that was released publicly” is a hell of a defense
“my client’s inane rambling about voter fraud sounds better when it comes from my mouth” is a hell of a defense
“Democrats saying that the goal is to keep Trump from running again shows that they’re trying to keep Trump from running again” is a hell of a defense
“I think my rambling defense speaks for itself, please go do something more important” is a hell of a defense

More from Trump

Numberonepal
Numberonepal
@numberonepal
1/ Stolen from the greatawakening(DOT)win...

I will only be making one post here. Do not ask who I am. Do with this information as you please.

The Trump Card is being played. It's much simpler than you all realize. Some of you have gotten it right.
TRUMP , THE LAST DAYS IF THE REVOLUTION
Zero HP Lovecraft
Zero HP Lovecraft
@0x49fa98
Much like the Gulf War, Trump's presidency never happened. Yes, there were soldiers in Kuwait, and there was a man named Donald Trump in the white house, but there was never a war, and there was never a presidency.

Trumpism was a bubble, and on Wednesday, it popped. In 2016, it felt like the beginning of a new American nationalism. Without Trump, that "movement" dies. Will those embers merely fade, or can the fire be rekindled?


If you want to transform the world, or your country, you cannot fuel your movement on discontent, nor on reasonableness. No, transformation can only be built on a foundation of extravagant hope

Gold toilets aside, Trump never had extravagance, in fact he had no content at all. He was the first fully post-modern president; what he did was so filtered through media that there's no effective difference between what happened and what the media says happened

We projected our dreams onto Donald Trump. A successful mass movement requires belief in an infallible leader or an irresistible doctrine. There is no mass movement without a little delusion (we call it a little delusion) "Reasonable" people can't effect big change
TRUMP
Advertisement
JaLove
JaLove
@LovesTheLight
Why am RTg this Rush post? Because @AnjillofLight_ just advised me that @rushlimbaugh is handing his show over to @realDonaldTrump tomorrow 10/9.

Playing both the Rush and Trump Cards

Coincidence the movie The Trump Card is out tomorrow 10/9. https://t.co/RT45TDE8HP


I'm your Huckleberry. I knew it.🤣
https://t.co/gqHfFWfxZO


All the Rush graphics are in linked threads throughout
##FLY##
[OWL]

https://t.co/b9px5Mt3iN


Only the full release of docs can give conclusive evidence.

Dangle Operation
Sanctions are coming
11/4
11/5


Make sure you go to the concession stand and get your popcorn, beverage and candy.
https://t.co/laVxyfS5ax
TRUMP
Chad Pergram
Chad Pergram
@ChadPergram
1) The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Senate Trial today
 
What is expected to be the final day of President Trump’s second impeachment trial will begin at 10 am et today. We anticipate a final vote on the guilt or innocence of the former President as early as midday.
TRUMP
Ryan Devereaux
Ryan Devereaux
@rdevro
Good to see the paper of record highlighting this important national news story that we’ve been covering at @theintercept for the past eight months.

Going to provide some links and info for those who might be interested in reading more on the topic.

In June, a trove of hacked law enforcement documents was posted online. I went through hundreds of those files to look at how law enforcement was treating antifa/anarchists vs groups on the far right.

Part of the reason I did this was because we had already published reporting showing that the NYPD was using a curfew in response to the George Floyd protests to hand over demonstrators to the FBI for questioning. Antifa was a subject of the interviews.

You can find that original reporting here: https://t.co/7vD7QuNLZP

And in more depth here:

As expected, the analysis of the docs posted online showed extensive law enforcement emphasis on antifa/anarchists even amid detailed evidence of threats and action from far right groups, including the murder of law enforcement
TRUMP

You May Also Like

itrade(DJ)
itrade(DJ)
@ITRADE191
Here is the detailed information of about strategy,

Entry time : 9.30 - 10
Exit : Upto you

Strategy :
Sell weekly ATM CE & PE at almost equal price
For ex : Sell Nifty 17250 CE at 50 and Nifty 17250 PE at 48 so it will become short straddle

Buy monthly ATM or near ATM CE & PE at matching price (5-10 points diff should be fine) as hedge
For ex : Buy Nifty 17250 CE at 150 and Nifty 17300 PE at 155 so it will become long straddle.

Weekly Short straddle + Monthly Long straddle

Adjustment:

• If you feel slightly bullish/bearish then no adjustment needed
• If Nifty moves 50 up or down and sustain then just simply roll up or down half of qnty and keep rest of the quantity. If market goes up or down further then roll up or down rest.

• If Nifty moves one side or about to breach BEP then add equal amount of lot. This can balance tested side. For ex: If I bought 17300 CE 4 lot as hedge then add 4 lot so you will have only one side risk . Note: Remember to keep SL at cost price (only for additional lot bought)

Capital requirement:
2.2 L for 4 lot
Adjustment requires additional capital upto 1L

Note : High risk high reward strategy, please don’t execute until you fully understand. Kindly do paper trading or backtest.
RR : 1:1
POP : 45-55%
OPTIONSLEARNINGS , ALL
XVIII Airborne Corps\U0001f409
XVIII Airborne Corps🐉...
@18airbornecorps
1 of 16: WE ARE ALL JEWS HERE: THE STORY OF RODDIE EDMONDS

One of the most moving and relevant stories of the Battle of the Bulge, or any American Soldier in any war, is that of Master Sergeant Roddie Edmonds, a Knoxville, Tennessee native, who served with the 106th Infantry.


2 of 16:

Roddie was captured early on in the Battle of the Bulge, on December 19th, when Panzer forces plowed through his unit.

He, along with almost his entire regiment, was forced to surrender.


3 of 16:

The men were transported to the Stalag IX-A POW camp in Ziegenhain, Germany.

Roddie was the senior enlisted American Soldier at the site. As such, he was the conduit between all American Soldiers and their German captors.


4 of 16:

In late January, the camp’s commandant, Major Siegmann [pictured here], ordered Roddie, a Christian, to identify all Jewish Soldiers and order them to stand in formation by themselves the next day.

[Jewish Soldiers were a minority within American units]


5 of 16:

Throughout WWII, captured Jewish Soldiers were often tortured and then killed by their German captors.

In fact, Jewish Soldiers had been told to bury their dog tags before capture. The dog tag identified Jews with the letter “H” for Hebrew.
SOCIETY
Advertisement
ArmaniTalks \U0001f399\U0001f525
ArmaniTalks 🎙🔥...
@ArmaniTalks
Shy people are either overthinking or highly observant of the social setting.

And in many cases it can be both.

'So what do I do?'

You learn the 75/25 law.

'What is that?'

The law of charisma...👇

Let's address the over thinkers first.

Do you have any idea why you overthink?

'Yea. Because others are judging how shy I am.'

Incorrect.

Others are thinking about themselves, not you.

But the fact that you think they are thinking about you, you fuck up the interaction.

Now you stay in your head too much & avoid the present moment.

A major no no in the social world.

Your tendency to think that others are judging you for being shy, coincidentally makes you more shy.

And that's when you start giving off a strange vibration to the social setting.

This is when you begin attracting comments like 'why are you so quiet?'
LIFE
EverythingOppresses
EverythingOppresses
@SoOppressed
The first area to focus on is diversity. This has become a dogma in the tech world, and despite the fact that tech is one of the most meritocratic industries in the world, there are constant efforts to promote diversity at the expense of fairness, merit and competency. Examples:

USC's Interactive Media & Games Division cancels all-star panel that included top-tier game developers who were invited to share their experiences with students. Why? Because there were no women on the

ElectronConf is a conf which chooses presenters based on blind auditions; the identity, gender, and race of the speaker is not known to the selection team. The results of that merit-based approach was an all-male panel. So they cancelled the conference.

Apple's head of diversity (a black woman) got in trouble for promoting a vision of diversity that is at odds with contemporary progressive dogma. (She left the company shortly after this

Also in the name of diversity, there is unabashed discrimination against men (especially white men) in tech, in both hiring policies and in other arenas. One such example is this, a developer workshop that specifically excluded men: https://t.co/N0SkH4hR35
TECH
The Light - Truthpaper
The Light - Truthpaper
@LightTruthpaper
Latest update from @TheBernician

1/19

Hancock, Whitty, Vallance & Ferguson Stand Accused of Pandemic Fraud.

After yet more damning evidence arose last week, further additions had to be made to the court papers, which we are now aiming to lay in the coming week.

2/19

The four defendants will be Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty, Patrick Vallance and Neil Ferguson, each of whom has inextricable and ultimately incriminating connections with Bill Gates and Big Pharma.

3/19

As well as three counts of fraud by false representation and seven counts of fraud by non-disclosure, under sections 2 and 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, we can now also prove that the entire worldwide scamdemic originated on these shores.

4/19

In fact, we can show that, without the dishonest statements and non-disclosures of the four defendants we are initially proceeding against, COVID-1984 would not have transpired.

5/19

Furthermore, the 1st defendant, Matt Hancock, cannot rely upon the defence of Parliamentary Privilege, on the ground that none of the evidence relied upon by the prosecution is capable of preventing parliamentarians from carrying out their lawful business in Parliament.
CULTURE