🚨Presentation for beginner Traders🚨
-Below I have included a docs with tons of info from learning TA, to finding trades and reading SEC filings.
-Also included is a section on the basics of using flow with @unusual_whales
-95 slides 🤯
-Free
More from Tradingthread
Friends here we go 🗝️
12 solid videos each 1 HR long teaching you all I know on #Options and day trading 🚀
This is my gift to the world ❤️
All of your questions have been answered here 👇👇👇
Help me with a❤️so we can share the TRUTH with the
TradingWarz FREE Indicators TOS
Holy Grail by Rich
https://t.co/yi7xeIsSTX
Inside Power by Rich
https://t.co/J6J8wOMRj6
Doubles by Rich
https://t.co/Tb6RyFjBTd
Outside Power by Rich
https://t.co/Wpr9OlCjid
Leave a ❤️ to help me out
12 solid videos each 1 HR long teaching you all I know on #Options and day trading 🚀
This is my gift to the world ❤️
All of your questions have been answered here 👇👇👇
Help me with a❤️so we can share the TRUTH with the
TradingWarz FREE Indicators TOS
Holy Grail by Rich
https://t.co/yi7xeIsSTX
Inside Power by Rich
https://t.co/J6J8wOMRj6
Doubles by Rich
https://t.co/Tb6RyFjBTd
Outside Power by Rich
https://t.co/Wpr9OlCjid
Leave a ❤️ to help me out
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".