Seeing a lot of popular names down big today, so let’s have a little chat.

What do you do when your hot stock is falling fast?

💥 (a thread)

Check your goals.

When do you need this money?

Now? In a few days? In a few years?

If you have time to wait, then it could make sense to hold on for now.
Remember your why.

Stocks rise and fall. It’s the nature of the market, and swings are the price of investing (h/t @morganhousel).
Just think about Apple. Amazing rally over the past few decades…with a lot of big drops.

https://t.co/odjl3C82B1
Back to the why. If your why behind buying this stock hasn’t changed, then it might be best to wait this drop out.
Re-frame your thinking. This could be a big opportunity.

If you’re optimistic on this stock and you want to be in it for the long run, this could basically be a sale for you.

10% off full price!

Think about opportunity when everybody else wants out.
Whatever you do, do NOT try to time the market.

You don’t know what the future holds. Nobody does.

Timing the market is a foolish game.
Nobody thought the market would rebound as quickly as it has.

And get this: one-third of all S&P 500 stocks have DOUBLED since March 23 (the bottom of the pandemic selloff).

If you sold then, you might’ve missed the incredible rally back up.

DON'T TRY TO PREDICT THE FUTURE.
...and most importantly, don’t panic!

Breathe, and keep your plan in mind — why you invested, when you need the money, when you told yourself you’d get out.

Now get there and crush it 👊
*get out there and crush it, ugh Mondays

More from Trading

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Great article from @AsheSchow. I lived thru the 'Satanic Panic' of the 1980's/early 1990's asking myself "Has eveyrbody lost their GODDAMN MINDS?!"


The 3 big things that made the 1980's/early 1990's surreal for me.

1) Satanic Panic - satanism in the day cares ahhhh!

2) "Repressed memory" syndrome

3) Facilitated Communication [FC]

All 3 led to massive abuse.

"Therapists" -and I use the term to describe these quacks loosely - would hypnotize people & convince they they were 'reliving' past memories of Mom & Dad killing babies in Satanic rituals in the basement while they were growing up.

Other 'therapists' would badger kids until they invented stories about watching alligators eat babies dropped into a lake from a hot air balloon. Kids would deny anything happened for hours until the therapist 'broke through' and 'found' the 'truth'.

FC was a movement that started with the claim severely handicapped individuals were able to 'type' legible sentences & communicate if a 'helper' guided their hands over a keyboard.