My number 1 stock pick for 2021 is: Pine Island Acquisition Corp.

$PIPP

Let me break down why I think this will be THE SPAC of 2021. 👇

TL:DR – the management team is loaded with President Biden’s closest friends and advisors. No other SPAC has this level of access.

$PIPP company overview:

-focused on defense, government service & aerospace
-perfect focus when you consider who is on their Management Team
$PIPP Management

-here's where it gets EXCITING
-founded by John Thain (ex Merrill Lynch CEO and Uber director)
-then STACKED with veteran Government and Administration key figures
$PIPP Insane Management Connections

-the list of PIPP "DC Partners" includes:

-- President Biden's pick for Secretary of State (Tony Blinken)
-- President Biden's pick for Secretary of Defense (Gen. Lloyd Austin).
$PIPP - The Joe Biden Connection

- Tony Blinken and President Biden are close allies.
- Blinken has been an advisor to Biden for decades
- Blinken set to be appointed Sec. of State
$PIPP - The Joe Biden Connection Pt.2

- General Lloyd Austin has been a long term advisor to Biden
- President Biden set to appoint Gen. Austin as Sec. of Defense.
$PIPP "Unusual" Access to Information

- $PIPP is so connected to Government that it needed to include disclose its "UNUSAL access to information" in its Nov. 2020 SEC S-1 Filing.
$PIPP Hedge Fund Ownership

- two of the biggest Hedge Funds loaded up with $PIPP stock right at the IPO

-- Ken Griffin/Citadel own 6.9%
-- Israel Englander/Millennium own 5.2%
$PIPP - Under the Radar

- crucially, $PIPP satisfies my "Not Chasing" requirement.
- minimal activity on FinTwit
- only 3 posts on Reddit
- a mere 450 "watchers" on Stocktwits

====> I'm still early on $PIPP
$PIPP - Tickers

Units = $PIPP.U - $11.00
Commons = $PIPP - $10.17
Warrants = $PIPP.W - $2.34
I'm long $PIPP units and commons.

More from Trading

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x