Getting rid of section 230 is an ADL & Greenblatt initiative. I'm sure Kushner is on board with this. This will make censorship 1000 x worse! Republicans, including Trump don't care about free speech or are ignorant of how this works. Will cement SV monopolies too. Thoughts?

I have repeatedly warned about the section 230 issue. You don't repeal it, you reform/enforce it. This will be a death blow to alternative tech platforms like GAB, who do not have teams of corporate lawyers to field frivolous lawfare attacks that will be waged if this happens...
It will give big tech the excuse they need to ban & censor even more accounts and to *really* act us publishers, editorializing. It gives them the excuse that they no longer have immunity and thus have to censor to avoid legal liability for posts/user behavior...
This will then cement the big tech companies who do have teams of corporate lawyers monopolies. This is what silicon valley has been lobbying for. They want to he regulated so they can use that as an excuse to purge content they don't like...
Removing section 230 will be the end of the internet as we know it. It will be the end of alt tech platforms like Gab that so many conservatives have been relegated to. So why are "Republicans" pushing to disenfranchise their own constituents even more? Because big donors want it
If the reason they want to get rid of section 230 is because of the insane censorship we already see, all they need to do is reform and/or ENFORCE it. It relies on them being "neutral platforms" which they clearly are not. Why not then fine them daily until they fix the problems
More than enough evidence has been produced, tons by @Project_Veritas & @JamesOKeefeIII that PROVES they are not "neutral platforms" and are in fact acting as publishers and editorializing and censoring based on political opinion...
Section 230 could be reformed to include massive daily fines to big tech companies until the situation has been rectified. We could also require them to be transparent about their actions and censorship, requiring them to provide detailed explanations of actions taken & why...
We could require source code to be made public. There are many options here that are available but clearly they dont WANT to fix the problems, they just want to appear as if they want to so they can campaign & fundraise off it. So disappointing.

More from Trading

Many of you have seen the famous Westrum Organizational Typology model, so prominently featured in State of DevOps Research, Accelerate, DevOps Handbook, etc.

This model was created Dr. Ron Westrum, a widely-cited sociologist who studied the impact of culture on safety


Thanks to Dr. @nicolefv, I was able to interview him for an upcoming episode of the Idealcast! 🤯

It was a very heady experience, and while preparing to interview him, I was startled to discover how much work he's done in healthcare, aviation, spaceflight, but also innovation.

I've read 4+ of his papers, so I thought I was familiar with his work. (Here's one paper:
https://t.co/7X00O67VgS)

I was startled to learn he has also studied in depth what enables innovation. He wrote a wonderful book "Sidewinder: Creative Missile Development at China Lake"


Dr. Westrum writes about China Lake Research Labs: "its design and structure had one purpose: to foster technical creativity. It did; China Lake operated far outside the normal envelope... Sidewinder & others were "impossible" accomplishments,

I love this book because it describes traits of organizations that routinely create and maintain greatness: US space program (Mercury, Gemini, Apollo), US Naval Reactors, Toyota, Team of Teams, Tesla, the tech giants (Amazon, Google, Netflix, Google)

You May Also Like