This information does not constitute financial advice. You know the drill. Let's get into it.
If you tell me the 15-minute chart shows a bearish divergence, I'll probably tell you I don't give a shit. This thread will teach you why.
Understanding timeframes is crucial in trading and technical analysis.
I'll teach you what they are, how they work and their use.
This information does not constitute financial advice. You know the drill. Let's get into it.
LTF = Lower timeframe
HTF = Higher timeframe
S/R = Support & Resistance
PA = Price Action
This is why if you're trading the 4h chart, you don't care much about a 1-minute bearish divergence. The movements on much lower timeframes take place much faster than on higher timeframes.
Closes constitute confirmation.
This is why many traders get shaken out at HTF levels, as happened in September 2020.
Regardless of your style, I recommend mapping out the HTF levels. Start with monthly, then weekly and daily levels.
Or, if you're truly a chad, trade HTF and also scalp around the levels.
- Map out HTF levels
- Watch LTF PA around HTF levels
- Find a timeframe that works for you.
- Don't let lower timeframes affect your high timeframe thesis.
If you need an exchange, join me on FTX. I got you a 5% discount on fees :)
https://t.co/Sll9nkNsRd
More from Trading
๐ก๐ถ๐ณ๐๐-๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ธ๐ป๐ถ๐ณ๐๐ ๐ข๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฆ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ด๐
Complete Backtest and Indicator link
๐งต A Thread ๐งต
๐ฆ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฝ:
๐ธ Monthly Option Buying
๐ธ 50 ema on 3 min timeframe
๐ธ Supertrend 10 , 3
๐ธ Chart : Banknifty , Nifty Futures as we backtested on futures
๐ธ Entry 9:20 to 3:00
๐ธ Max 3 Entries per day
๐ธ Premium nearest to 200 Rs only
[2/18]
Why Monthly Option buying ?
๐ธ Less theta decay compared to weekly options
๐ธ Less Volatility
๐ธ Supertrend and MA Settings
[3/18]
๐ธ Indicator Link
๐ธ Click on the below ๐ญ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฌ -> ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐๐ข๐ท๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐ฆ๐ด -> ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ณ๐ต from favourites and start using it !
๐ธ https://t.co/zVXavqLBto
[4/18]
๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ :
๐ธ Max 6 Trades per day ( Both CE and PE buy)
๐ธ Timings 9:20 am to 3:00 pm
๐ธ Supertrend : 10,3
๐ธ Moving Average 50 ema
[5/18]
Complete Backtest and Indicator link
๐งต A Thread ๐งต
๐ฆ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฝ:
๐ธ Monthly Option Buying
๐ธ 50 ema on 3 min timeframe
๐ธ Supertrend 10 , 3
๐ธ Chart : Banknifty , Nifty Futures as we backtested on futures
๐ธ Entry 9:20 to 3:00
๐ธ Max 3 Entries per day
๐ธ Premium nearest to 200 Rs only
[2/18]
Why Monthly Option buying ?
๐ธ Less theta decay compared to weekly options
๐ธ Less Volatility
๐ธ Supertrend and MA Settings
[3/18]
๐ธ Indicator Link
๐ธ Click on the below ๐ญ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฌ -> ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐๐ข๐ท๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐ฆ๐ด -> ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ณ๐ต from favourites and start using it !
๐ธ https://t.co/zVXavqLBto
[4/18]
๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ :
๐ธ Max 6 Trades per day ( Both CE and PE buy)
๐ธ Timings 9:20 am to 3:00 pm
๐ธ Supertrend : 10,3
๐ธ Moving Average 50 ema
[5/18]
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thingโphysical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thingโphysical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Iโm torn on how to approach the idea of luck. Iโm the first to admit that I am one of the luckiest people on the planet. To be born into a prosperous American family in 1960 with smart parents is to start life on third base. The odds against my very existence are astronomical.
Iโve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.
In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the personโs part, whereas โsmartโ luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.
So, was I โluckyโ to be born when I wasโnothing I had any control overโand that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write โWhat Works on Wall Street?โ Absolutely.
Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.
Ironies of Luck https://t.co/5BPWGbAxFi
— Morgan Housel (@morganhousel) March 14, 2018
"Luck is the flip side of risk. They are mirrored cousins, driven by the same thing: You are one person in a 7 billion player game, and the accidental impact of other people\u2019s actions can be more consequential than your own."
Iโve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.
In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the personโs part, whereas โsmartโ luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.
So, was I โluckyโ to be born when I wasโnothing I had any control overโand that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write โWhat Works on Wall Street?โ Absolutely.
Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.