If you tell me the 15-minute chart shows a bearish divergence, I'll probably tell you I don't give a shit. This thread will teach you why.

Understanding timeframes is crucial in trading and technical analysis.

I'll teach you what they are, how they work and their use.

Usual disclaimer, this thread is simply my personal understanding of timeframes and their use, not a globally agreed-upon thing.

This information does not constitute financial advice. You know the drill. Let's get into it.
Some abbreviations

LTF = Lower timeframe
HTF = Higher timeframe
S/R = Support & Resistance
PA = Price Action
Timeframes refer to how much time a single candlestick represents on a chart. There are timeframes all the way from a single second to multiple years.
The 1-hour timeframe consists of 4 15-minute candles, or 60 1-minute candles.

This is why if you're trading the 4h chart, you don't care much about a 1-minute bearish divergence. The movements on much lower timeframes take place much faster than on higher timeframes.
This means the bearish divergence on the 1 minute might play out, reverse and completely be dalai-lamad before the 4h candle even closes.
This is also why I personally prefer to wait for candle closes to trade. LTF PA above a HTF level is just a fakeout if the HTF candle closes below the level.

Closes constitute confirmation.
This means that a weekly level can see price violate the level quite uncomfortably deep during the week, as long as it closes above.

This is why many traders get shaken out at HTF levels, as happened in September 2020.
Conclusion: if you trade high timeframes, you better bring your steel hands and diamond balls.
So, which timeframe is more important? This naturally depends on your trading style, but in any case, the higher timeframes are considered to be the stronger ones.
In other words, HTF S/R levels are generally respected across all timeframes, whereas a LTF level will likely be completely ignored on the higher timeframes.

Regardless of your style, I recommend mapping out the HTF levels. Start with monthly, then weekly and daily levels.
These will be the most important levels that many will have marked out. There will be low-timeframe volatility around the HTF levels, which often allows for great scalps.
I also recommend monitoring lower-timeframe PA around your level to get an idea of what the close will be like. For example, if the 1h chart looks like a dog's dinner a few hours before daily close, it will probably affect the daily candle.
You have to find which timeframe works for you. If you are generally impatient, lower timeframes will work better for you. If you're patient and risk-averse, trade the higher timeframes.

Or, if you're truly a chad, trade HTF and also scalp around the levels.
Most important of all, do NOT let ugly looking lower timeframes shake you out of high timeframe positions. This happens all the time, don't be that guy.
Long story short:

- Map out HTF levels
- Watch LTF PA around HTF levels
- Find a timeframe that works for you.
- Don't let lower timeframes affect your high timeframe thesis.
I hope this helps. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask.

If you need an exchange, join me on FTX. I got you a 5% discount on fees :)

https://t.co/Sll9nkNsRd

More from Trading

๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ณ๐˜๐˜†-๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ธ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ณ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜†๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐˜†

Complete Backtest and Indicator link

๐Ÿงต A Thread ๐Ÿงต

๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฝ:
๐Ÿ”ธ Monthly Option Buying
๐Ÿ”ธ 50 ema on 3 min timeframe
๐Ÿ”ธ Supertrend 10 , 3
๐Ÿ”ธ Chart : Banknifty , Nifty Futures as we backtested on futures
๐Ÿ”ธ Entry 9:20 to 3:00
๐Ÿ”ธ Max 3 Entries per day
๐Ÿ”ธ Premium nearest to 200 Rs only

[2/18]

Why Monthly Option buying ?
๐Ÿ”ธ Less theta decay compared to weekly options
๐Ÿ”ธ Less Volatility
๐Ÿ”ธ Supertrend and MA Settings
[3/18]


๐Ÿ”ธ Indicator Link
๐Ÿ”ธ Click on the below ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฌ -> ๐˜ˆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ด -> ๐˜ˆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜Š๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต from favourites and start using it !

๐Ÿ”ธ
https://t.co/zVXavqLBto
[4/18]

๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€ :
๐Ÿ”ธ Max 6 Trades per day ( Both CE and PE buy)
๐Ÿ”ธ Timings 9:20 am to 3:00 pm
๐Ÿ”ธ Supertrend : 10,3
๐Ÿ”ธ Moving Average 50 ema
[5/18]

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thingโ€”physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Iโ€™m torn on how to approach the idea of luck. Iโ€™m the first to admit that I am one of the luckiest people on the planet. To be born into a prosperous American family in 1960 with smart parents is to start life on third base. The odds against my very existence are astronomical.


Iโ€™ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.

In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the personโ€™s part, whereas โ€œsmartโ€ luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.

So, was I โ€œluckyโ€ to be born when I wasโ€”nothing I had any control overโ€”and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write โ€œWhat Works on Wall Street?โ€ Absolutely.

Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.