More from JayneshKasliwal
๐งต Thread ๐งต
[1/15]
๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ธ ๐ฆ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ is a Stock screening tool that is useful to screen stocks based on Technical & Fundamentals.
๐ธ It scans stocks by using technical indicators like RSI, MACD, divergences, etc.
๐ธ It also uses fundamental tools like Book Value, EPS,PE etc
[2/15]
How To Create A Scan ?
Go to https://t.co/JJEJBg3Cd8 & click on ๐๐ณ๐ฆ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ฏ under ๐๐ค๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด.
[3/15]

๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ๐ฝ ๐ง๐ผ ๐๐ถ๐น๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฆ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ธ๐
We can select segments of stocks of our choice, e.g. cash or futures stocks, Nifty 100 etc.
Click on green โ+โ icon to add conditions.
[4/15]

๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐น๐ฒ ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ๐ & ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ผ๐ป ๐ข๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ธ We can select any timeframe of candles in Chartink, from minutes to years.
๐ธ And compare two candles using comparison operators like ๐๐ฒ๐ถ๐ข๐ญ ๐ต๐ฐ or ๐๐ณ๐ฆ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ ๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ , crossovers etc
[5/15]

More from Trading guides
You May Also Like
BREAKING: President Donald Trump has submitted his answers to questions from special counsel Robert Mueller
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) November 20, 2018
Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.
Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.
Mueller's team was 100% partisan.
That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election
They looked high.
They looked low.
They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.
And they found...NOTHING.
Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.
What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?
THERE WEREN'T ANY.
Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.
Once upon a time there was a Raja named Uttฤnapฤda born of Svayambhuva Manu,1st man on earth.He had 2 beautiful wives - Suniti & Suruchi & two sons were born of them Dhruva & Uttama respectively.
#talesofkrishna https://t.co/E85MTPkF9W

Prabhu says i reside in the heart of my bhakt.
— Right Singh (@rightwingchora) December 21, 2020
Guess the event. pic.twitter.com/yFUmbfe5KL
Now Suniti was the daughter of a tribal chief while Suruchi was the daughter of a rich king. Hence Suruchi was always favored the most by Raja while Suniti was ignored. But while Suniti was gentle & kind hearted by nature Suruchi was venomous inside.
#KrishnaLeela

The story is of a time when ideally the eldest son of the king becomes the heir to the throne. Hence the sinhasan of the Raja belonged to Dhruva.This is why Suruchi who was the 2nd wife nourished poison in her heart for Dhruva as she knew her son will never get the throne.

One day when Dhruva was just 5 years old he went on to sit on his father's lap. Suruchi, the jealous queen, got enraged and shoved him away from Raja as she never wanted Raja to shower Dhruva with his fatherly affection.

Dhruva protested questioning his step mother "why can't i sit on my own father's lap?" A furious Suruchi berated him saying "only God can allow him that privilege. Go ask him"

Like company moats, your personal moat should be a competitive advantage that is not only durableโit should also compound over time.
Characteristics of a personal moat below:
I'm increasingly interested in the idea of "personal moats" in the context of careers.
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
Moats should be:
- Hard to learn and hard to do (but perhaps easier for you)
- Skills that are rare and valuable
- Legible
- Compounding over time
- Unique to your own talents & interests https://t.co/bB3k1YcH5b
2/ Like a company moat, you want to build career capital while you sleep.
As Andrew Chen noted:
People talk about \u201cpassive income\u201d a lot but not about \u201cpassive social capital\u201d or \u201cpassive networking\u201d or \u201cpassive knowledge gaining\u201d but that\u2019s what you can architect if you have a thing and it grows over time without intensive constant effort to sustain it
— Andrew Chen (@andrewchen) November 22, 2018
3/ You donโt want to build a competitive advantage that is fleeting or that will get commoditized
Things that might get commoditized over time (some longer than
Things that look like moats but likely aren\u2019t or may fade:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
- Proprietary networks
- Being something other than one of the best at any tournament style-game
- Many "awards"
- Twitter followers or general reach without "respect"
- Anything that depends on information asymmetry https://t.co/abjxesVIh9
4/ Before the arrival of recorded music, what used to be scarce was the actual music itself โ required an in-person artist.
After recorded music, the music itself became abundant and what became scarce was curation, distribution, and self space.
5/ Similarly, in careers, what used to be (more) scarce were things like ideas, money, and exclusive relationships.
In the internet economy, what has become scarce are things like specific knowledge, rare & valuable skills, and great reputations.