BC TATAELXSI
Saved by @SAnngeri

#TataElxsi 4720 high

More from Sunil Dhawan🚩 🇮🇳

Sunil Dhawan\U0001f6a9 \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3
Sunil Dhawan🚩 🇮🇳...
@SunilDhawan13
#IIFL .25% x 3 cmp 340
@Definedge
IIFL
Sunil Dhawan\U0001f6a9 \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3
Sunil Dhawan🚩 🇮🇳...
@SunilDhawan13
#IRCTC cmp 2400
patience is virtue

no exit. though its slightly overbought, any retracement could be chance

2700 level brings more strength
IRCTC
Advertisement
Sunil Dhawan\U0001f6a9 \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3
Sunil Dhawan🚩 🇮🇳...
@SunilDhawan13
#MindTree cmp 4925
#niftyIT
@Definedge
MINDTREE
Sunil Dhawan\U0001f6a9 \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3
Sunil Dhawan🚩 🇮🇳...
@SunilDhawan13
HDFCAMC - #HDFCAMC chart
HDFCAMC
Sunil Dhawan\U0001f6a9 \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3
Sunil Dhawan🚩 🇮🇳...
@SunilDhawan13
#Reliance D .15% x 3 cmp 2173

Is it heading for new ATH https://t.co/a1WX6EZbuq
RELIANCE

More from Tataelxsi

The_Chartist \U0001f4c8
The_Chartist 📈...
@nison_steve
Tata Elxsi - Target of 6163 as per PnF chart achieved. https://t.co/wykvClQnMf
TATAELXSI
Rajeev
Rajeev
@chartswealth
Tata Elxsi
(Monthly & Weekly chart - log scale)

➡️ Technical analysis 👇

#TATAELXSI #stocks #stockstowatch #StocksInFocus
TATAELXSI
Advertisement
Professor
Professor
@DillikiBiili
Tata Elxsi levels !

I like this company/Stock immensely.

KPIT chart is already on timeline. https://t.co/Ek9nKOk10D
TATAELXSI
The_Chartist \U0001f4c8
The_Chartist 📈...
@charts_zone
Don't be biased in the market. Even if the stock has moved up a lot, it is consolidating tightly near the highs. This consolidation was much needed. I will look to go long with more tightness & the follow-up BO, if any. Not long yet. the stock is still strong.

Tata Elxsi
TATAELXSI
JAGADEESH CHOWDARY
JAGADEESH CHOWDARY
@jbotlagunta
📊TATA ELXSI LIMITED (#TATAELXSI)

🏷Market Cap: 52,550 Cr

🏷One of the World’s leading provider of design and technology services across industries including Automotive, Broadcast & communications and Healthcare

💥Business Analysis

A Thread 🧵


🌁BUSINESS

🏷Part of prestigious TATA Group

🏷Established in 1989, A forward looking IT business

🏷Company earns revenue primarily from providing information technology, engineering design, systems integration & support services, sale of licenses and maintenance of equipment

🌁The company operates in 2 segments

1. Software Development & Services

It is further sub divided into EPD and IDV.

🏷Embedded Product Design (EPD)
🏷Industrial Design & Visualisation (IDV) division

2. System Integration & Support (SIS)


🌁MANAGEMENT

🏷Manoj Raghavan (MD & CEO) : 22 Years of experience (2.42 Yrs tenure)

🏷CEO compensation ($USD 578.96K) is below average for companies of similar size

🏷CEO compensation has increased by more than 20% in the past year


🌁SHAREHOLDING PATTERN

🏷Change in promoter holding (Vs last quarter): -0.21%

🏷Change in FII holding (Vs last quarter): -0.78%

🏷Change in DII holding (Vs last quarter): +0.59%

🏷Change in public holding (Vs last quarter): +0.41%
TATAELXSI , TATAELXSIINFO

You May Also Like

John Myles White
John Myles White
@johnmyleswhite
This post is pretty bizarre, but it manages to hit on so many false beliefs that I've seen hurt junior data scientists that it deserves some explicit

(1) The notion that R is well-suited to "building web applications" seems totally out of left field. I don't feel like most R loyalists think this is a good idea, but it's worth calling out that no normal company will be glad you wrote your entire web app in R.

(2) It is true that Python had some issues historically with the 2-to-3 transition, but it's not such a big deal these days. On the flip side, I have found interesting R code that doesn't run in modern R interpreters because of changes in core operations (e.g. assignment syntax).

(3) "Most of the time we only need a latest, working interpreter with the latest packages to run the code" -- this is where things get real and reveal some things that hurt data scientists. If this sentence is true, it's likely because you don't share code with coworkers.

(3) Really is a broader issue in data science: people only think of what they need to do their work if no one else existed and code was never maintained. Junior data scientists almost always operate on projects they start from scratch and don't have to maintain for long.
DATA SCIENCE
Julien \U0001f332
Julien 🌲
@julien
1/ there is this sense when you are young that your accomplishments need to be a list of things that seem impressive to others. A list of several items you did.

This isn't actually right, so here is another suggestion.

2/ I remember being 26 and writing about reading 52 books a year. I wrote blog posts about it. They got copied. It became "a thing." Now it's in Twitter bios. It looks impressive but it's insanely useless and I shouldn't have done it.

3/ what I should have known at that time is that only young idiots like myself, with no accomplishments, find list of tiny achievements impressive. Anyone who has actually done anything of substance doesn't gaf

4/ what is actually difficult, and worthwhile, instead is to do ONE single thing for a very, very long time. It's much harder and much rarer and results in outlier outcomes much more often.

Of course you can find this out too late if you are chasing the dragon of Ted talks etc

5/ if I had only worked on a startup for a year, I would've gotten nowhere, the same way that if you lift for 3 months, it achieves nothing. Everything good in life comes from perseverance, but at the beginning, you're just like "I need to be somebody!!!"
LIFE
Advertisement
Techno Funda Investing
Techno Funda Investing
@TechnoFunda6
Thread 🧵explaining #ROE & #ROCE and its use in #FundamentalAnalysis

(Must read for #FA learners)

🙏Like & RT to spread learning with all 🙏

Views Welcome 👉 @dmuthuk @Vivek_Investor @datta_arvind @caniravkaria @FI_InvestIndia @AdityaD_Shah

#FundamentalAnalysis #StockMarket


1⃣

Return on Equity (#ROE) and Return on Capital Employed (#ROCE) are two important Financial Ratios used in #FundamentalAnalysis of Stocks.

#StockMarket #Investing

2⃣

Return on Equity (ROE) is the ratio of Net Income (Net Profit) of a company and it’s Total Equity (Shareholder's Equity).

Here - Shareholders Equity = Share Capital + Reserves & Surplus.

#StockMarket #Investing #FundamentalAnalysis


3⃣

#ROE is a measure of how much net profit a company is making for every rupee invested by its shareholders in the company.

It can be said that higher the ROE, better it is for the equity shareholders. It tells shareholders about how effectively their money is being used.

4⃣

However, you should not trust high ROE blindly. Biggest drawbacks or weaknesses of ROE is that it completely ignores debt.

Hence for companies having high levels of debt, ROE will give a higher but misleading value & therefore we need to look at #ROCE along with #ROE.
ACCOUNTING , FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSIS , ROE VS ROCE ANALYSIS
Nick Kapur
Nick Kapur
@nick_kapur
A thread of images from a Japanese illustrated history of America from 1861.

Here is George Washington (with bow and arrow) pictured alongside the Goddess of America. 1/


Here is Christopher Columbus (seated at center) reporting his discovery of America to Queen Isabella of Spain.

So far, kinda normal, but wait for it.... 2/


Now it's the American Revolution. Here is George Washington defending his wife "Carol" from a British official named "Asura" (same characters as the Buddhist deity). 3/


And here is Washington's "second-in-command" John Adams battling an enormous snake. 4/


Here is Washington and his wife "Carol" meeting an extremely youthful Benjamin Franklin, who has an impressive squat. 5/
CULTURE
foone
foone
@Foone
So I was talking to @gewt about Job: A Comedy of Justice and I came up with a theory that I think explains why Heinlein's late-period work is so kinda-terrible and why I still enjoy it so much


So Heinlein had always been very interesting in the short parts of his novels, like the little snippets inside chapters. He had a very fun writing style, and wrote some fun dialogue with fun characters, right?>
It probably comes from how much of his early stuff was short fiction

And I think what happened with a lot of his longer works is that he'd just start writing fun bits and hope it would end up going somewhere or having a bigger plot by the end. like eventually he'd figure out where this was going, then go back and rewrite it into a cohesive whole

and I'm sure he had editors that'd help this process. No editor would let you publish something as rambly and changing-gears-every-other-chapter as The Number Of The Beast, for example... unless you were God-King Of Science Fiction 1980s Robert Heinlein.

so basically I think what happened is that by the 80s (when he was in his seventies!!) he lost the drive to go back and rewrite and he was too Untouchable for editors to make him.
CULTURE