AR20-21 Notes

Tata Elxsi

Design Digital

Helping Enterprises Re-imagine Products & Services

Simplifying Technological Complexity

Retweet to help more Investors read AR.🙂

1/

Message From the Chairman

~Strong Operating Performance
~Diversify-Geopolitical & Currency Risk mitigated
~Ranked in the leadership zone of Zinnov Zones 2020 Report
2/

DESIGN DIGITAL

~Industrial Design & Visualization
~Healthcare
~Media Broadcast & Communications
~Transportation
~System Integration
3/

Notes from MDA

~IT Sector- 8% of GDP, 52% of Services Exported
~Capex budgets diverted to IT & digitalization
~Disturbance in Automotive Industries
~Global Auto demand is going to increase but at a slow pace
4/

Notes from MDA

~Media & Communication -1 of the few sectors that did well in pandemic
~5G adoption faster due to pandemic
~Inflection point for digital transformation in healthcare
5/

Notes from MDA

~Client Diversification
~Geographical Diversification
~Global Automotive ER&D to rebound
~Global Hi-Tech led ER&D to grow further
6/

Notes from MDA
~ Industrial Design & Visualization
~System Integration & Support
7/

Financial Analysis

~Other expenses decreased
~Overhead expenses came down drastically
~Travel Exp gone down 60-70%.
~A&P and Communication Exp fell 20%
~Leading to higher-margin & PAT
8/

~Balance Sheet
~Profit & Loss
~Cash Flow Statement
9/

More Resources to learn:

~10 concall Notes: https://t.co/9NzvH2rTkz
~5 Min Stock Idea(July-2020) https://t.co/FP5EWu6vMV
~Infographic: https://t.co/0V8KpHkWck
~FY20 AR Notes https://t.co/rApz6XYfHw
~@soicfinance video: https://t.co/SuuwDaTS7h

End

More from Smart Sync Services

More from Tataelxsi

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?