How to set Small Stop loss ??
Please👇
1️⃣ If we trade on Monthly chart - stop loss set on weekly lower low
2️⃣ If we trade on Weekly chart than SL on Daily LL
3️⃣ Daily chart - Hourly LL
4️⃣ Hourly chart - 15 minutes LL
5️⃣ 15 minutes chart - 5 minutes LL
More from jitu
From 108 to 320
Almost 3x
Now looks ready for #ATH
Sabka time aata hain. Only needs patience with #PriceAction
@Rishikesh_ADX https://t.co/8xzh8VGMi9
#Delta corp
— jitu (@Jitendra_stock) August 7, 2020
Only listed Casino company
Due to lockdown, waiting for unlocking
Weekly higher high
Upside 130 to 150 pic.twitter.com/f0qJpIYpNL
More from Stoploss
Read and follow this.. he has aptly explained about various methods to trail.
2. TRAILING METHODS-
— Trader knight (@Traderknight007) December 24, 2020
1. SWING POINT METHOD-
In this method we use the swing points or the HH- HL OR LH-LL points for placing sl,
In this method we trail our sl when the stock make a Higher low after our entry and keep Trailing the sl till it hits. pic.twitter.com/CqzCkLdWmC
This is the reason for retailers stoploss. Check it out \U0001f447 https://t.co/fnHPgzCCVn pic.twitter.com/njvqgM9PI3
— Learn to Trade (@learntotrade365) July 28, 2021
You May Also Like
I might have a panic attack due to excitement!!
Read this thread to the end...I just had an epiphany and my mind is blown. Actually, more than blown. More like OBLITERATED! This is the thing! This is the thing that will blow the entire thing out of the water!
Tik Tok pic.twitter.com/8X3oMxvncP
— Scotty Mar10 (@Allenma15086871) December 29, 2020
Has this man been concealing his true identity?
Is this man a supposed 'dead' Seal Team Six soldier?
Witness protection to be kept safe until the right moment when all will be revealed?!
Who ELSE is alive that may have faked their death/gone into witness protection?
Were "golden tickets" inside the envelopes??
Are these "golden tickets" going to lead to their ultimate undoing?
Review crumbs on the board re: 'gold'.
#SEALTeam6 Trump re-tweeted this.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?