• It's always a team effort.
• Retention is key to growth.
• It's rare a product grows without marketing.
Okay, let's go:
I helped a startup grow from $3M to $24M in 8 months.
The secret? Be a little delusional.
Here are 14 lessons I learned about growing a rocketship:
• It's always a team effort.
• Retention is key to growth.
• It's rare a product grows without marketing.
Okay, let's go:
Wedge: It is simply a strategy to win a large market by initially capturing (1) a tiny part of a larger market or (2) a large part of a small adjacent market.
Our wedge was our unique point-of-view.
Our POV gave the AHA! moment.
You need 3 kinds of players: a visionary, executor and processor.
I was the executor, my boss a visionary & my other two key teammates were amazing at processing and making it work.
Lesson:Find a great combination that feels like magic.
Our product created its category and innovated its field.
It was a unique sub-category & take on learning.
The timing was right in this case.
Category drives POV & growth.
Products are built to fit with channels. Channels do not mold to products.
I grew the product with solely two channels i.e. Google Ads & Facebook ads.
Then, I found Tiktok working for us -- we found a new channel fit.
Instead of selling our point of view only, we sold transformation.
Our customers saw a huge difference in 6 months after using the product.
We made them heroes. We told their stories. We showed their transformation.
Because the founder was an authority in the space.
We exploited the story because it scroll stopped and made people pay attention.
Our niche: wealthy homeschooling and gifted kids' parents.
I just doubled down on the messaging that resonated with them.
It worked like a charm. What's a sub-niche you can try?
My motivation was to work for the vision but my boss's unrealistic goal pushed me even further.
We wanted to grow $3Mn to $10Mn within 3 months. I thought my boss was BS-ing.
Somehow we believed in it, and it worked.
In my first month, I lost the company $40,000 on Google ads.
I spent $150K on influencer marketing, the ROAS was abysmal.
Failing is growth. Failing is part of figuring out
I've worked for 3 cost-effective brands, and 2 high-priced products. I have high- priced products grow faster.
Our product was expensive so it disqualified a lot of bad customers.
Our CAC to LTV ratio was 1:10.
My Google ads were working fine but I hired a specialist.
At scale, hire a specialist to do their job or at least some dedicated.
Below were the changes we made to our Google ads:
Most orgs are experimenting but not documenting.
When you don't document, the new folks will make the same mistakes.
We tested weekly what messaging resonated on our homepage.
This gave us deeper insights.
We were getting 10-15% leads on our home but we didn't convert them enough.
After talking to customers, I learned that people had nuanced questions and wanted to get closer to the founding team.
We added: Educational & orientation webinars
If your product has a demand but not enough conversions.
You might have too much friction to pay.
Our sign-up flow took 2-3 days for someone to pay. We made it 5mins by adding Typeform (40% conversion lead to paid).
1. Follow me @aazarshad
for more thought-provoking marketing content to help you get better.
2. RT the tweet below to share this with others who might enjoy it :)
More from Startup
In order to expand their business, startups need to identify and use efficient products (tools). We have listed down Top 5 Products for Startups, and what makes them the top products.😎👇🏻
#prodmgmt #productsforstartups
https://t.co/0IPd51VibU
https://t.co/hICowg9VvP
https://t.co/T3epyQXEoX
https://t.co/Sm8G1JNxx0
#prodmgmt #productsforstartups
https://t.co/0IPd51VibU
https://t.co/hICowg9VvP
https://t.co/T3epyQXEoX
https://t.co/Sm8G1JNxx0
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
THREAD: 12 Things Everyone Should Know About IQ
1. IQ is one of the most heritable psychological traits – that is, individual differences in IQ are strongly associated with individual differences in genes (at least in fairly typical modern environments). https://t.co/3XxzW9bxLE
2. The heritability of IQ *increases* from childhood to adulthood. Meanwhile, the effect of the shared environment largely fades away. In other words, when it comes to IQ, nature becomes more important as we get older, nurture less. https://t.co/UqtS1lpw3n
3. IQ scores have been increasing for the last century or so, a phenomenon known as the Flynn effect. https://t.co/sCZvCst3hw (N ≈ 4 million)
(Note that the Flynn effect shows that IQ isn't 100% genetic; it doesn't show that it's 100% environmental.)
4. IQ predicts many important real world outcomes.
For example, though far from perfect, IQ is the single-best predictor of job performance we have – much better than Emotional Intelligence, the Big Five, Grit, etc. https://t.co/rKUgKDAAVx https://t.co/DWbVI8QSU3
5. Higher IQ is associated with a lower risk of death from most causes, including cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, most forms of cancer, homicide, suicide, and accident. https://t.co/PJjGNyeQRA (N = 728,160)
1. IQ is one of the most heritable psychological traits – that is, individual differences in IQ are strongly associated with individual differences in genes (at least in fairly typical modern environments). https://t.co/3XxzW9bxLE
2. The heritability of IQ *increases* from childhood to adulthood. Meanwhile, the effect of the shared environment largely fades away. In other words, when it comes to IQ, nature becomes more important as we get older, nurture less. https://t.co/UqtS1lpw3n
3. IQ scores have been increasing for the last century or so, a phenomenon known as the Flynn effect. https://t.co/sCZvCst3hw (N ≈ 4 million)
(Note that the Flynn effect shows that IQ isn't 100% genetic; it doesn't show that it's 100% environmental.)
4. IQ predicts many important real world outcomes.
For example, though far from perfect, IQ is the single-best predictor of job performance we have – much better than Emotional Intelligence, the Big Five, Grit, etc. https://t.co/rKUgKDAAVx https://t.co/DWbVI8QSU3
5. Higher IQ is associated with a lower risk of death from most causes, including cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, most forms of cancer, homicide, suicide, and accident. https://t.co/PJjGNyeQRA (N = 728,160)