THREAD: Congress & The Football Penalty

Anyone else find it remotely odd that every name mentioned in this article matches one in Congress?

Notice it was published at roughly noon today, 1/11/2021 - this is important and we'll come to back to

2) Let's look at the names listed...

Browns > Anthony G. Brown > Maryland [D]

Baker > Dave Baker > Minnesota [R]

Mayfield > Debbie Mayfield > Florida [R]

Steelers > ref to Steele dossier
3) Joel Bitonio > Joel Fry > Iowa [R]

Cleveland > George Cleveland > North Carolina [R]

Michael Dunn > Neal Dunn > Florida [R]

Blake Hance > Blake Moore > Utah [R]

Peter King > Pete King > New York [R] (just left office on 1/3)

New York Jets > Joe Jett > Arkansas [R]
4) Now that we've got all the names sorted - let's looks at the comms...

emergency offensive

25 years thanks to some real luck > 25th amendment

forced to play > backed in a corner

held up their end of the bargain

late in the game
5) Steelers defenders > Steele dossier defenders

had just met him in the locker room

stepped up in the fourth quarter

documented

arrival

signed off

practice squad

Week 17

within driving distance of Cleveland

regular testing program

signed with a new team > flipped
6) five consecutive days

team hotel

backup Case Keenum > backup Case > laptop > Keenum > password
7) Remember the article was published today, 1/11/2021 around noon.

Which just happens to be when the House Democrats introduced the 'new' Impeachment bullsh!t...

https://t.co/hNjgn4hwzg
8) Kinda makes ya wonder how many of those names sitting in Congress had something to do with this new Impeachment.

There's a reason we were told "News unlocks".

MSM = propaganda for us and comms for [them]

Expand your thinking.
@threadreaderapp unroll

More from Sport

It's Sunday, Fed blackout, am recovering from soccer match, sipping on double espresso, so of course a perfect time to take on Tyler Cowen here. 🙂


Like many people, I enjoy reading Tyler's blog. But there are times (alright, many times) I disagree with him. This is no big deal. I also disagree with myself sometimes (especially my past self). But his recent post left me

What is he trying to say here? After thinking about it for a bit, I think he's critiquing the idea that "running the economy hot" leads to employment *and* real wage gains. Perhaps the former, but only at the expense of the latter. At least, this is what a textbook IS-LM model

tells us if one "runs the economy hot" through increased fiscal stimulus (on consumption and transfers, not public infrastructure investment). If this is what he meant, then he should have just said so, instead of labeling this a "Keynesian" proposition.

In fact, this property follows as a *neoclassical* proposition that is embedded in the IS-LM framework. (For non-economists, note that Keynes did not invent IS-LM; the framework was developed later by Hicks as an interpretation of *some* parts of the General Theory.)

You May Also Like

One of the most successful stock trader with special focus on cash stocks and who has a very creative mind to look out for opportunities in dark times

Covering one of the most unique set ups: Extended moves & Reversal plays

Time for a 🧵 to learn the above from @iManasArora

What qualifies for an extended move?

30-40% move in just 5-6 days is one example of extended move

How Manas used this info to book


Post that the plight of the


Example 2: Booking profits when the stock is extended from 10WMA

10WMA =


Another hack to identify extended move in a stock:

Too many green days!

Read