Salk Institute, founded by vaccine pioneer Jonas Salk, has authored and published a bombshell scientific article revealing that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is what’s actually causing vascular damage in covid patients
The novel coronavirus’ spike protein plays additional key role in illness.
https://t.co/0IziKukuZL
https://t.co/4oU1rC2ydf
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2
https://t.co/4oU1rC2ydf
These 💉 people are shedding proteins, as well. Also, why are infected individuals able to donate blood and plasma, while vax'd are only able to donate blood?
https://t.co/OTzg8spant
These vax people are shedding proteins, as well. Also, why are infected individuals able to donate blood and plasma, while vax'd are only able to donate blood? https://t.co/guMGmETbLk pic.twitter.com/AnyvxsKRLR
— ReclamationJane (@JaneReclamation) May 25, 2021
THREAD\U0001f9f5I'm going to break parts of this link down in a thread because it is too, important to let people just skim over.
— TXgrlWatching\U0001f4bb\u2694\U0001f6e1 (@VeritasTXgem) March 30, 2021
Data from Pfizer documents and EMA, analyzed by a microbiologist.
LINK\U0001f53bhttps://t.co/UqiFgM5Yvo https://t.co/1Y4Mt1X5Wi
https://t.co/BowIdnBSD2
1. \U0001f6a8 \u27a1\ufe0f But their approach to the second section CONCERNING SIDE EFFECTS WAS IN STARK CONTRAST to that. They DIDN'T CONDUCT ANY CRITICAL SCRUTINY AT ALL, THERE ARE LOTS OF SIDE EFFECTS THAT WERE NOT DISCUSSED AT ALL in public... pic.twitter.com/wUgwe4zQQA
— TXgrlWatching\U0001f4bb\u2694\U0001f6e1 (@VeritasTXgem) March 30, 2021
https://t.co/h2hxh6hQK0
Thread\U0001f9f5
— TXgrlWatching\U0001f4bb\u2694\U0001f6e1 (@VeritasTXgem) April 8, 2021
Dossier by Dr David Martin https://t.co/ZQzLRlpr9Hhttps://t.co/kgrz6kQzyU pic.twitter.com/sSzvAWB5JE
More from TXgrlWatching💻⚔🛡
Senate Report Written in 1973, says “Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency…Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the president may: seize property;…
— Bad Legal Takes (@BadLegalTakes) June 24, 2021
seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication;…restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.”
The president can act through Executive Order, Presidential Proclamation, or through his many agencies, which include most of the alphabet agencies.
Senate Report🔻
https://t.co/1WaeF2Rxf6
In the introduction to Senate Report 93-549:
"A majority of the people of the united States have lived all their lives under emergency rule.-(Exhibit 2)
Remember, this report was produced in 1973. The introduction goes on to say:
"For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency."
You May Also Like
He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...
... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:
Ivor Cummins BE (Chem) is a former R&D Manager at HP (sourcre: https://t.co/Wbf5scf7gn), turned Content Creator/Podcast Host/YouTube personality. (Call it what you will.)
— Steve (@braidedmanga) November 17, 2020
Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.
Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9
Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."
I wonder why...
Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x
Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.
Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq
Please add your own.
2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you
1/\u201cWhat would need to be true for you to\u2026.X\u201d
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) December 4, 2018
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody: https://t.co/Yo6jHbSit9
3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.
“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”
“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”
4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:
“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”
“What’s end-game here?”
“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”
5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:
“What would the best version of yourself do”?