Categories Society
Why do people not trust âexpertsâ, the govt or the media?
Hereâs a little bit on what happened around masks.
While some will say the science changed or the information changed, it did not. The politics changed (as admitted in the
thread)âŠ
First, studies back to 2007 recommended mask wearing as protocol for similar respiratory viruses. This was known by âexpertsâ. https://t.co/ANy5bWyhhI; https://t.co/XqlwDQtRrW;
Hereâs what we were told.
February 2020, people were buying masks on their own. The US Surgeon general said to
Seriously people- STOP BUYING MASKS!
— U.S. Surgeon General (@Surgeon_General) February 29, 2020
They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus, but if healthcare providers can\u2019t get them to care for sick patients, it puts them and our communities at risk!
https://t.co/UxZRwxxKL9
February 2020, Wapo- âHow to prepare for coronavirus in the U.S. (Spoiler: Not sick? No need to buy any masks.)â (you may need to scroll the thread to see
How to prepare for coronavirus in the U.S. (Spoiler: Not sick? No need to buy any masks.) https://t.co/RC6Y0wRd8q
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) February 26, 2020
February 2020, CNN âThere's been a run of surgical masks in the US because of the coronavirus scare. You don't need them, physicians
Yes. I wore a mask while running earlier. pic.twitter.com/KMQf6pkf3V
— Bill Hanage (@BillHanage) January 15, 2021
First I posted the photo after a couple of interviews this week in which mask use outside was discussed in the context of surging infections due to the variant B.1.1.7. Here's one
Great conversation between @BillHanage, @j_g_allen and @writtenbysalma about masks and other measures to improve safety during the pandemic. Starts at 2 hours 4 mins. https://t.co/6sACsU3mCI
— Adam Hamdy (@adamhamdy) January 14, 2021
And then this with RTE where were talked about mask use in the context of the situation in the Republic of Ireland, where cases are surging. I commented that I run with a mask. Hence the
Dr. William Hanage, Associate professor of epidemiology at Harvard University discusses whether we should wear masks outdoors & while exercising due to Covid-19 variants#RTEPT | #Covid19 | @BillHanage | @franmcnulty pic.twitter.com/8VAPaReczG
— RT\xc9 Prime Time (@RTE_PrimeTime) January 14, 2021
Some asked âwhy are you doing this outside?â â I know where theyâre coming from. Risk of transmission is MUCH lower outside. If all contacts were outside there probably would not *be* a pandemic. But it's also not nil
While running outside? \U0001f928
— jenny t. jackson \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 (@jmomteague2) January 16, 2021
and remember this is also about solidarity. Seeing a person wearing a mask is a sign that they are looking out for you and not just themselves, because masks greatly reduce the risk of transmission
It's not unusual here in NYC. Not all runners, but many. Most bicyclists. Almost all pedestrians on the sidewalk. Like that since the summer. I assume it's not strictly necessary in lowering the spread, but it seems a show of solidarity as much as anything.
— Rick Bruner (@rickbruner) January 16, 2021
"We do want and will have an inclusive field of philosophy. That we will have, and, if it involves the destruction of your departments and institutions, we cannot help it."
— Dr. Johnathan Flowers says "Fuck your Democracy." (@shengokai) January 13, 2021
The above is from Gen. Sherman on what is necessary to restore the Union during the Civil War, the sentiment is apt for my position on philosophy: if we are to have an inclusive field and the structure of the field prevents that, then that structure must be destroyed. (2/n)
Now, I understand that this sounds harsh, but consider why it sounds harsh: so much of the pushback against transphobia in philosophy, and the recommendations made to address transphobia in philosophy sounds like "damage" to philosophy by established philosophers. (3/n)
And in response to that perception of damage or destruction, they push back hard to preserve the "integrity" of the field, regardless of the harm being done to the marginalized people who have to survive an inhospitable field that refuses to change. (4/n)
Now, this position was anticipated by Sara Ahmed in the following:
âIndeed so often just talking about sexism as well as racism is heard as damaging the institution. If talking about sexism and racism is heard as damaging institutions, we need to damage institutions.â (5/n)
Think about how many times you say wine is the solution. Itâs not.
(You know what is the solution to everything by the way? Justice.)
(Also: 156 days here.)
For everyone responding defensively: 1) thatâs a sign to do some self-examination; 2) when youâre hungover all the time youâre not operating a full capacity; 3) patriarchy likes us numb because it keeps us quiet.
https://t.co/iMd11oxP36
So, are we all ready for "2020: The Sequel"?
— Mugi Padoru (@AusMoogle) December 27, 2020
What fresh hell awaits the world next year?
Speculate.. it amuses me lol. pic.twitter.com/AOhuqfWT2Y
You guys know I'm part of Collapse Gang and 2020 has certainly been a year of the kind of vindication I really didn't want to see this early.
I've been expecting something along the lines of the "Descending staircase" of the Tainter Model and 2020 seems like one of those periods where the step down is happening.
Eventually, things will hit a point where they'll stabilise and a sort of normalcy will return.
Only there'll be a bunch of stuff that just can't be done any more and we all just have to get used to that.
We're already seeing ham-handed attempts to set public expectations.
The "Great Reset" isn't so much a conspiracy theory as a pisspoor exercise in expectations management to get people to accept "Yeah we lost the capability to do these things you grew up with and we're NEVER getting it back, at least not this side of a new dark age"