Year end holidays are a time for peace, family meeting and friendship. But not for stalkers. They have no life, just hatred. In the middle of January 1. night, haunted Ramla Akhtar, the Pakistani repulsive whore, was barking and ranting as usual.

No surprises Ramla Akhtar's Twitter account is such a stinking crap that it attracts no audience.
With her last 3200 tweets on @GruaAbuseArkive, Ramla Akhtar can only reach a 436 total engagement... 87% of her tweet are totally ignored.
With just two tweets, Bernard Grua, Ramla Akhtar's main stalking target, exceeds the engagement Akhtar "reaches" with 3200 tweets...
The very despicable part of Akhtar's stalking is that Bernard Grua's engagement of 291 (more than Akhtars total engagement) is on a tweet he made to answer Akhtar's calumnious denunciation to Nantes first deputy mayor, Bassem Asseh...
With more than 13,900 tweets via her two Twitter accounts, Akhtar still did not learn on how to use this Social Media. What a stupid troll.
Ramla Akhtar Twitter account has an enormous volume of posts; But this is tatal crap. This account is dead. 💩🤮
Massive stalking does not work. Bernard Grua's Twitter audience is resilient and growing. Especially since France can't stand Pakistani hate speech and terrorists.

More from Society

Two things can be true at once:
1. There is an issue with hostility some academics have faced on some issues
2. Another academic who himself uses threats of legal action to bully colleagues into silence is not a good faith champion of the free speech cause


I have kept quiet about Matthew's recent outpourings on here but as my estwhile co-author has now seen fit to portray me as an enabler of oppression I think I have a right to reply. So I will.

I consider Matthew to be a colleague and a friend, and we had a longstanding agreement not to engage in disputes on twitter. I disagree with much in the article @UOzkirimli wrote on his research in @openDemocracy but I strongly support his right to express such critical views

I therefore find it outrageous that Matthew saw fit to bully @openDemocracy with legal threats, seeking it seems to stifle criticism of his own work. Such behaviour is simply wrong, and completely inconsistent with an academic commitment to free speech.

I am not embroiling myself in the various other cases Matt lists because, unlike him, I think attention to the detail matters and I don't have time to research each of these cases in detail.

You May Also Like