Island Reversal is a short-term pattern depicted by two gaps roughly at the same level thereby giving it a shape of an island surrounded on two sides by a gap.
Remember - a short-term pattern to trade.
SBI
More from The_Chartist 📈
You are seriously missing a lot of information if you are not maintaining a trading journal. It is much better if you also take a snap of the charts you trade for the post-analysis.
This exercise will tell you about your inherent strengths & weaknesses. 👇👇
This exercise will tell you about your inherent strengths & weaknesses. 👇👇
How to record a trading journal (TJ) & what to analyze?
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) December 14, 2021
What is in a TJ?
Buy Date
Stock Name
The time frame you analyzed (D/W/M)
Long/Short?
Buy Price
SL
Sell Price
Risk took (% of capital)
Sell date
No. of days held
P/L
P/L as % of capital
Buy Reason?
Invested capital/trade pic.twitter.com/WnrvmYuOV0
More from Screeners
You May Also Like
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.