A simple trading system with 2 #Movingaverages
13 & 21 - Both are fibonacci Nos & capture "Divergence & Convergence" as in #Trendindicator
No Indicator, No Supertrend
Blue line - 13 Sma
Red Line - 21 Sma
When Blue moves above Red line, a BUY triggers
1. BUY Triggered @ "17174"
More from Van Ilango (JustNifty)
#Hdfc (3190++)
#Hdfcbank (1724++)
#Reliance (2834++)
#ITC (274++) these are "just min. targets"
& many more would move up significantly
@rlnarayanan https://t.co/iVYE1F7l6v
#Nifty 3rd is sub-dividing as in chart:
— Van Ilango (JustNifty) (@JustNifty) October 13, 2021
[1]st: 16396 - 17793 = 1397
[2]nd: 17793-17948-17453 - Irregular flat
[3]rd: 17453+1397=18850 OR
: 17453+1928=19381 OR
: 17453+2096=19549 OR
: 17453+2260=19713 OR
Nothing wrong in projecting till holds "17990"
You ask me or any other persons, they'll tell you their subjective view however unbiased they attempt to be.
It is their view and not necessarily the market's.
My subjective view is labelled in the charts.
Follow #Priceaction https://t.co/37iXFtWPzU
Currently reading the book you put on your website. Also, from this if we consider 18600 as 5 th wave end of Nifty ideally it's doing the 1st 12345 of downtrend, of which do e already 1234, currently going towards 5 which I believe should go below 100% of 4th retracement wave
— de soloist \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@ChakiArijit) November 4, 2021
Remembered it & made entry @ open for the "High rewarding 3rd wave"
Much appreciation🙏 to @ap_pune for his regular sharing of vital info. & wisdom from years of experience.
#auropharma "Hour t/f" for "Traders"
— Van Ilango (JustNifty) (@JustNifty) March 21, 2022
In search of the highly rewarding 2nd wave entry.
Today's & tomorrow's #priceaction would have more clarity for entry either @ 615-620 or above 655 https://t.co/20S0Lvc7ej pic.twitter.com/OFlf9MLkqz
More from Screeners
You May Also Like
Ironies of Luck https://t.co/5BPWGbAxFi
— Morgan Housel (@morganhousel) March 14, 2018
"Luck is the flip side of risk. They are mirrored cousins, driven by the same thing: You are one person in a 7 billion player game, and the accidental impact of other people\u2019s actions can be more consequential than your own."
I’ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.
In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the person’s part, whereas “smart” luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.
So, was I “lucky” to be born when I was—nothing I had any control over—and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write “What Works on Wall Street?” Absolutely.
Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.