Trendlyne has all the research reports available for free for most stocks.
@Trendlyne
Here are all for Laurus
More from Tar ⚡
OPM: 23%
Free Float: <5%
QoQ continuous increase in ownership by institutions
ROE: ~20%
ROCE: ~28%
EV by EBITDA: 15
Leading developer of Indigenous Military Drones
Exports are prime focus for the company
D: Invested, not a recommendation
Lots of under owned stocks with robust financials within Defense Sector \U0001fa96\U0001f396\ufe0f
— Tar \u26a1 (@itsTarH) April 12, 2022
You don't even have to try looking very hard to find something interesting
Market is short sighted and loves to buy high and sell low
Sequent is a long gestation stock, it won't deliver it's real earnings until FY23-25
Not suitable investment for those who want 100% return/yr
@itsTarH hey Tariq, any idea why is Sequent falling?
— Vivek (@pa_stock) September 27, 2021
https://t.co/7ytUeSd7gg
Don't expect the earnings to go anywhere till FY23.
— Tar \u26a1 (@itsTarH) August 10, 2021
Real growth will only come post FY24.
I expect the stock to either correct or stay muted till then. https://t.co/lUQfzxojTO
More from Screeners
#bearrun
#BearMarket
Head & Shoulders pattern, double top and bearish RSI divergences fail more often in bull market and generally gives a very good SAR trade. Vice versa is also true for bear market.#bullrun #BullMarket
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) February 9, 2021
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".