https://t.co/4VPiXD1T6R
How to find #Stocks for Short Term Momentum
A thread with 10 Screeners ๐งต๐งต๐งต
Kindly Re-Tweet like for Max Reach ๐
More from My First Stock
Mistakes to avoid in Intraday ๐งต๐งต
8 Years Experience in 8 Tweets
Worth any workshop of 10-15k
Re-Tweet Like to help others ๐๐
1) Psychology Mistakes - Don't change your stand after entering a trade
Everyone think against his own trade after entering a trade.
- Don't move SL accept it
- Don't exit before SL hit
You analysis is๐ฉ once you are in a trade and that will improve with time.
2) Position Size Mistakes - Don't enter with big quantity at once
Intraday is a game of small SL and you might hit SL even if your analysis is correct.
Give chart some space to move and let it take your SL of 1000 quantity but if it moves in your fav then increase it to 2-3k
3) Still want to take Big Position size ??
Only when SL is very tight -
1) Naukri - Explained in chart
2) Reversal Big Quantity explained in BNF
4) Time frame mistakes -
Many beginners only trade with 3-5 min TF
Dude you know nothing in 3-5 min TF, its like taking trades from ground floor and pro traders checking daily TF are at 5th floor.
Their sight from 5th floor is better
Explained here
8 Years Experience in 8 Tweets
Worth any workshop of 10-15k
Re-Tweet Like to help others ๐๐
1) Psychology Mistakes - Don't change your stand after entering a trade
Everyone think against his own trade after entering a trade.
- Don't move SL accept it
- Don't exit before SL hit
You analysis is๐ฉ once you are in a trade and that will improve with time.
2) Position Size Mistakes - Don't enter with big quantity at once
Intraday is a game of small SL and you might hit SL even if your analysis is correct.
Give chart some space to move and let it take your SL of 1000 quantity but if it moves in your fav then increase it to 2-3k
3) Still want to take Big Position size ??
Only when SL is very tight -
1) Naukri - Explained in chart
2) Reversal Big Quantity explained in BNF
4) Time frame mistakes -
Many beginners only trade with 3-5 min TF
Dude you know nothing in 3-5 min TF, its like taking trades from ground floor and pro traders checking daily TF are at 5th floor.
Their sight from 5th floor is better
Explained here
Time Frame importance -
— My First Stock (@myfirststock99) May 14, 2022
1) 3 min - For Execution
( indicators provide early signals and less reliable)
2) 15 min - to look at trend of week, Support and Resistance of last 4-5 days
3) Daily - to check current trend and Short Term S-R (More reliability)
Charts - pic.twitter.com/SWHcQQ8m0F
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x