1/n
SSB Scam: Here are the evidences to show as to the involvement of senior officers in this Scam since so many years. The concerned GTO wrote to the Comdt pointing out the illegality and favouritism. Comdt didn't do anything since it was the case of the son of DG Recruiting.

2/n
Having failed to get any positive response from the Comdt, Selection Centre, the GTO then wrote to the then COAS, Gen Dalbir Singh bringing out the impropriety on the part of all concerned including the DG Recruiting whose own son was being favoured for TA Entry.
3/n
The COAS responded through his AG who assured that necessary corrective actions were being taken but he didn't stop the entry of the son of the DG Recruiting who was getting favoured. The AG offered to meet the GTO at Allahabad & then met him also the very next day there.
4/n
Astonished to see the award of PVSM to the said DG Recruiting inspite of a clear cut charge of fraud against him, the GTO again wrote to the COAS questioning the award of PVSM. However, neither any reply was ever received nor the illegal entrant was stopped from joining TA..
5/n
The GTO didn't stop here. He then sent an email to the new COAS, Gen Bipin Rawat (now CDS) about it.The result,the GTO was threatened. Fed up with continuous attempts of the senior officers to hush up the matter, the GTO resigned & his resignation was accepted within no time.
n/n
CBI has now taken formal cognizance of this matter & has reportedly sought the permission of all concerned, under Sec 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 to proceed with this matter. The said illegal entrant continues to serve & is a Major at present in a TA Unit.
@adgpi @DefenceMinIndia @rajnathsingh @SpokespersonMoD @ETDefence @rajatpTOI @ShivAroor @gauravcsawant @PMOIndia @narendramodi

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".