#Thread When Mahabali Bali, who drew half the power of the enemy, faced Hanumanji.

The Ramayana has an interesting episode of the war of Hanuman and Bali. This passage offers many lessons. No matter how strong a person becomes, no matter how rich he should be, he should not boast.
Bali had the boon that whoever comes before him for war, half of his strength will be absorbed in Bali. On the basis of this boon, Bali beat the big warriors to dust.
Bali used to challenge people here and there. One day, he was screaming in the forest that who can beat me.
Hanumanji was doing penance in the same forest and was reciting the name of his adorable Lord Rama. Bali's shouting disrupted his austerity. He said to Bali, Vanar Raj you are very strong, no one can beat you, but why are you screaming like this?
Bali was infuriated by this. He challenged Hanuman, even Ram. Bali said, Hanuman! Even your Ram cannot beat me. Have courage, call your Ram.
Hanuman is enraged after seeing Bali making fun of Lord Ram and he accepts Bali's challenge. It was decided that there would be a war between the two as soon as sunrise the next day.
The next day Hanuman was ready and left for War. Brahma appeared and he tried to convince Hanuman not to accept Bali's challenge.
On this Hanuman said, Lord! Bali was not challenging me only, He challenged Lord Ram also. So I will teach him a lesson.
When Brahma tried to explain then Hanumanji said - If I step back now, what will the world say? On this, Brahma said, okay, you go to the war, but take only a tenth part of your power, surrender the rest to your stage of worship. To regain this power by returning from the war.
Hanumanji agreed and took tenth part of his total strength to face Bali. According to the boon as soon as he stepped into the war, half of Hanumanji's power transfer to Bali's body.
This triggered a tremendous movement in Bali's body. He felt a sea of ​​strength was moving in the body. In a few moments, Bali felt as if the veins of his body would break and blood would come out.
Then Brahma appeared and he told Bali that you consider yourself the most powerful in the world, but your body is not able to handle a small part of Hanuman's power. If you want to keep yourself alive then run away from Hanuman.
Bali did the same and later realized that Hanumanji was much more powerful than that.
He bowed down to Hanumanji and said - Despite the immense Power, Hanumanji remains calm and continues to sing Rambhajan and I am the one who is not even equal to one tenth part of his Power and was challenging him.
📸: Pinterest
Next Thread: Unsolved Mysteries Of The Kaal Bhairav.(coming soon)
Please Like and Retweet, Not asking anyone to follow but if anyone likes my content please follow me because shortly I will post lots of unexplored content.
Thanks🙏
@LostTemple7 @DograTishaa @rightwingchora @DivineElement @desi_thug1 @DeepaShree_AB @VertigoWarrior @DeepaShree_AB @mamatarsingh @InfoVedic @VipashaRanjan @LevinaNeythiri @VandanaJayrajan @arungovil12

More from Ranvijay Singh🇮🇳

#Thread 1 नवंबर 1979, समय: रात्रि 1 बजे श्री तिरुपति बालाजी मंदिर के गर्भगृह में लटकी विशाल कांस्य घंटियाँ अपने आप बजने लगी।


यह चमत्कारी घटना क्यों हुई और कैसे हुई यह जानने से पहले हमें इस घटना के घटित होने से एक सप्ताह पहले के बारे में जानना होगा। उस समय तिरुमला क्षेत्र पानी की भारी किल्लत से जूझ रहा था। सूखे की स्थिति बन चुकी थी।


तिरुमला पहाड़ी पर पीने के पानी के कुएं भी सूख रहे थे (वर्तमान पापा नासनम जलाशय तब निर्माणाधीन था)। गोगरभम जलाशय का जल स्तर भी तेजी से घट रहा था। मंदिर प्रशासन कड़े निर्णय लेने पर मजबूर था।


तीव्र जल संकट से बहुत परेशान, तिरुमला तिरुपति देवस्थानम बोर्ड के कार्यकारी अधिकारी पीवीआरके प्रसाद ने तुरंत तिरुमला में चल रहे जल संकट से निपटने के उपायों पर चर्चा करने के लिए अपने थिंक टैंक की एक आपातकालीन बैठक बुलाई।


इंजीनियरों ने पूरी तरह से असहाय होने का अनुरोध किया और बदले में कार्यकारी अधिकारी को चेतावनी देते हुए कहा, "तिरुमला मंदिर के टैंकों और जलाशयों में अब बहुत कम पानी के भंडार हैं जिन्हें केवल बहुत सीमित समय के लिए ही परोसा जा सकता है।

More from Religion

Tripundra Dhaaran - Paapa Vimukti

Our generations are fascinated about Tripundram being just a religious symbol. There are in depth meanings of such a Tilak on a Seeker's Forehead


The very first mistake is the way it is applied.

Tripund isn't applied with dry Bhasm, it should be made wet and then applied in a prescribed manner with proper use of fingers and direction of application. Bhasm is collected from various sources


The most important ones mentioned in upanishats are 1. Yagnya Kund Bhasm 2. Bhasm made from Cow's Dung alone. A special agnihotram was perform to save the Bhasma after that for Dhaarana. A major mantra while applying bhasm is Mrutyunjaya Mantra


Dwijas have a very long process of applying the Tripundram along with their Sandhyavandanam. For commoners there are some basic rules people have to follow while applying Bhasm


Bhasm Applied in Morning - Should be mixed with water and applied
Bhasm Applied during Afternoon - Should be mixed with Chandan and Applied
Bhasm Applied during and after Pradosh - Should be applied Dry as such

You May Also Like

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.