RADICO
Double Top Buy triggered above 809.63 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/bG6IxYbvpT

RADICO
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) May 27, 2021
Double Top Buy above 628.8 daily close on 3% Box size chart. pic.twitter.com/DzihquAh9J
More from Saket Reddy
Time to Pyramid!
Double Top Buy, T20 Pattern - Bullish & Super Pattern - Bullish above 707.72 daily close on 3% Box Size chart. https://t.co/3jyru5LSpN

LAURUSLABS
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) June 22, 2021
Haters are still hating it, time to pyramid once again!
Double Top Buy, T20 Pattern - Bullish & Super Pattern - Bullish above 625.07 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/EDqa7dAAKn pic.twitter.com/Evj76taKId
More from Radico
6.857%(1214)
whenever above this level further chart update with Fibonacci extension.
#Probability
#RADICO -742.30
— Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) \u092e\u0948\u0902Schedule Tribes) (@idineshptl) June 7, 2021
Best thing happened on chart is
High 2007(219.50)
Low 2020(220)
0.50 paise differance. And now at 742..abf going on.. #Wave principle pic.twitter.com/zV8WA9WfGK
You May Also Like

his name might sound familiar because the new cortellucci vaughan hospital at mackenzie health, the one doug ford has been touting lately as a covid-centric facility, is named after him and his family
but his name also pops up in a LOT of other ford projects. for instance - he controls the long term lease on big parts of toronto's portlands... where doug ford once proposed building an nfl stadium and monorail... https://t.co/weOMJ51bVF

cortellucci, who is a developer, also owns a large chunk of the greenbelt. doug ford's desire to develop the greenbelt has been
and late last year he rolled back the mandate of conservation authorities there, prompting the resignations of several members of the greenbelt advisory
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".