3) Antifragile: Life is chaotic. The best aren't broken by the chaos—they build structure to benefit from it.
10 fascinating traits of highly-successful people:
1) Enjoy Being Wrong: The most successful people legitimately enjoy being wrong. They’ve learned to embrace new information that forces you to change your viewpoint—these "software updates" improve upon the old.
(read on)
3) Antifragile: Life is chaotic. The best aren't broken by the chaos—they build structure to benefit from it.
5) Self-Awareness: The most successful people are hyper self-aware. They know their unique edge (and their weaknesses).
7) Focus on Questions, Not Answers: They ask great questions. It allows them to aggregate insights more effectively.
9) Impatient Long-Term Thinkers: Long-term thinking plus short-term impatience for action is the recipe for success.
What others would you add to the list?
Follow me @SahilBloom for more writing on life and growth. I’ll write a deeper dive on this in my newsletter. Join 115K others! https://t.co/32basvHOHZ
More from Sahil Bloom
How to Win (without talent or luck)
20+ principles compiled from the most impressive leaders and thinkers in the world.
How to Win (without talent or luck):
— Sahil Bloom (@SahilBloom) October 16, 2021
20 Ways to Stand Out in a Hiring Process (that don’t involve your resume)
You can stand out without fancy degrees or credentials—learn how.
The hiring process is ultra-competitive.
— Sahil Bloom (@SahilBloom) May 31, 2021
But you\u2019ve incorrectly been told that the only way to stand out is by having fancy degrees and credentials.
THREAD: 20 ways to stand out in a hiring process (that don\u2019t involve your resume):
Common Interview Questions (& how to nail them)
Interviews suck—proper preparation makes them suck slightly less.
The interview process is ultra-competitive.
— Sahil Bloom (@SahilBloom) August 7, 2021
But with proper preparation, it is possible to stand out.
THREAD: 20 common interview questions, what they really mean, and how to nail them:
How to Write Cold Emails (or DMs)
Because one lucky break can make all the difference…
One cold email can change your life.
— Sahil Bloom (@SahilBloom) October 24, 2021
Here's how to write a great one:
More from Principles
You May Also Like
i wonder if you can make a thread bout witchcraft in malaysia.. or list of our own local gods/deites..
— r a y a \U0001f319 (@lcvelylilith) February 20, 2020
Before I begin, it might be worth explaining the Malay conception of the spirit world. At its deepest level, Malay religious belief is animist. All living beings and even certain objects are said to have a soul. Natural phenomena are either controlled by or personified as spirits
Although these beings had to be respected, not all of them were powerful enough to be considered gods. Offerings would be made to the spirits that had greater influence on human life. Spells and incantations would invoke their
Animist ceremonies of a religious or magical nature were normally held for the purpose of divination or making a request. This would either be done at a keramat or at a shrine similar to the Thai spirit houses or Chinese roadside shrines pic.twitter.com/I1hliyi0x3
— \u2745\u1710\u170b\u1713\u170e (@uglyluhan) June 16, 2019
Two known examples of such elemental spirits that had god-like status are Raja Angin (king of the wind) and Mambang Tali Arus (spirit of river currents). There were undoubtedly many more which have been lost to time
Contact with ancient India brought the influence of Hinduism and Buddhism to SEA. What we now call Hinduism similarly developed in India out of native animism and the more formal Vedic tradition. This can be seen in the multitude of sacred animals and location-specific Hindu gods
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.