Categories Politics
Crowds gather as US Congress meets to certify Biden's victory in the US elections
Follow our LIVE updates: https://t.co/NhMfhINfhx

"They say we lost, we didn't lose" - Trump addresses supporters as US Congress meets to certify Biden's election victory. https://t.co/BGvVUE4vtx
Watch live 👇
President-elect Joe Biden selects Judge Merrick Garland for attorney general.
Follow our LIVE updates: https://t.co/bEtzPSpR6b

US Senate majority and minority leaders address joint session of Congress as protesters push past barriers at Capitol building https://t.co/NTwVecwByL

(Part One:
The Most Fascist Things Donald Trump Has Done; A Thread PART ONE! pic.twitter.com/5SPApcXcS4
— Antifa International (@antifaintl) October 5, 2020
("Fascism," explained roughly via tweet = racism + ultra-nationalism + sexism + attacks on human rights, the media, & unions + obsessions w/ national security & law & order + near-religious fervor for charismatic leader + cronyism + corruption + election fraud.)

23) Trump hires white supremacist Stephen Miller to write his immigration
24) Trump hires white supremacist Steve Bannon as his 2016 campaign manager.
The front page of The New York Times for Jan. 7, 2021 (late edition). pic.twitter.com/enmoNs55vm
— The New York Times (@nytimes) January 7, 2021
what they do when they call us rioters and looters (unarmed protestors asking for police brutality to be held accountable) and them mobs and protestors (heavily armed and refusing to accept the election results of a “democratic” process) We need to stop asking why they do this
And understand that it’s a tool. Propaganda and misinformation and rhetoric. They program us to be outraged and stay exhausted and fighting the seemingly arbitrary and “insignificant” uses of words. The media is the picture painter, the visuals released with a single if you will
They are all owned by the same people and then they slightly sqew the POV of their proposed audiences. So something like Fox knows that their main audience (viewer count=profit) is alt-right “conservatives” and CNN knows that it’s main audience is more liberal. All of these news
Sources will give out the same exact messaging with different angles so as to keep their viewers watching as long as possible. THEY MAKE MONEY OFF OF SENSATIONALIZING, CENSORING, SKEWING the truth and making it more entertaining. If y’all look at Ancient Rome and their tactics

To all those RW Hindus & Non-Khalistani Sikhs telling me Sikhs are all patriots & only minorities are khalistanis. Then how come this body that manages Gurudwaras & sikh temples & appoints Jathedar of Akal Takht is supporting Khalistani protests?! https://t.co/3cxn4NPT5n pic.twitter.com/e56K4BEy6t
— Syamkrishnan Kamath (@Dharmi2020) December 7, 2020
Udasis the monastic wing of Sikhism that was started by Guru Nanak's son Sri Chand was expelled from Gurudwaras, their murtis thrown out & declared non sikh along with Nanakpanthis & several other Sikh sects that were close to Hinduism.

If Khalistan terrorism was not anti-Hindu should explain why one after the other each & every sect in Sikhism that is similar to Hinduism was thrown out since Akali movement of 1925? Sehajdharis are latest, in 2016 to be
35,000 Punjabi Hindus were killed by Khalistani terrorists in Punjab. I am yet to hear any demand of justice for them!
— Amit Srivastava (@AmiSri) December 4, 2020
Why were the the 1984 riots always mentioned by leaders across political spectrum, leaders in India & abroad. But have you ever heard anyone talk about those hindus who were killed by
Sir, with due respect data about deaths are not hidden!
— Amit Srivastava (@AmiSri) December 4, 2020
But for Sikhs, the issue is raised at every level - in state & national politics, in public, in judiciary, even at international level. But have you seen anyone even mentioning those unfortunate Hindus? That\u2019s the point!
One of the most ancient sects of Sikhs founded by Guru Nanak's son Sri Chand the Udasis, enjoyed state patronage & support under the sikh Empire of Ranjith Singh. How did they go from there to not even being sikhs in a matter of a few decades?
https://t.co/H7sYSUeBiS

What Murph's reporting (& opining) on is a survey that showed, in a time of international crisis where Australia has performed relatively well, politicians benefit from a "competence dividend"
\U0001f644 pic.twitter.com/odGMUKzPnT
— Richard Chirgwin (@R_Chirgwin) December 25, 2020
That's neither a surprise, nor something to be sneered at. But it's a one-paragraph story. It's what you'd expect to see.
The journalist's role, you'd think, would be to critically unpick that. Work through what premiers & the PM did to deserve it, or otherwise.
One case that could be made is that the premiers stepped up, acted visibly & decisively on behalf of their respective states, & the PM is largely riding on their coattails.
Murph, though, has been on a weird campaign to position Morrison in particular as a statesman-in-waiting.
Once the federal government authorised Job Seeker/Lover/Keeper, Murph was convinced this was (bound to be) the end of Ideological Warrior Morrison and we'd see the emergence of pragmatic Morrison who could govern reasonably, in ways atypical of the way his party had been trending
LOL
And LOL again.
The early economic interventions were made with a gun to his head. The idea he'd suddenly become a learning learner who learns was something Murph seemed desperate to hold on to, like it was important for her sense that federal politics could work properly.
(Pashinyan's block holds the absolute majority in parliament)
Opposition protest facing the Armenian parliament in Yerevan. pic.twitter.com/I6AOZ9KLki
— 301\U0001f1e6\U0001f1f2 (@301_AD) December 9, 2020
Only the people can speak on behalf of the people, not separate groups - Pashinyan
Voices of individual groups cannot be considered the voice of the people - Pashinyan
It is not the media who decide who the prime minister is, people decide - Pashinyan
The question arises as to why the opposition does not demand early elections. Why do political forces have only one goal - to decide without the will of the people? Pashinyan
A-1
They didn\u2019t follow due process. They should all resign...
— Andrew Masters (@AndrewM87769226) January 14, 2021
the Military, starting with the Joints Chiefs on down are is walking a fine line in watching this take place...some might say they are doing their jobs...I'm not convinced that we have to take the Nation to the precipice because layers need for f'ing evidence.
A-2
These people - and I use the term loosely - are a disgrace to this Nation and the American People.
USDoJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, DNI - ALL KNEW this was happening...
248 Years of the finest Democratic Republic in History.
Now only 7 days...to the waterfall's edge.
A-3
Ever Wonder what Romulus Augustulus felt like in the last days of the Roman Empire?
When the people tolerate BULLSHIT as accepted truth ignoring common sense and FACTS to the contrary, what comes next is not going to be pretty.
A-4
If the military KNOWS what it going on and shipping ARMED National Guardsmen to the front lines in Washington - that means the hire-ups KNOW TOO...that would be collusion, Misprision of Felony, Misprision of Treason...not good traits for Military officers.
A-5