PM @narendramodi's vision 'sabka saath sabka vikas', reflects in #JalJeevanMission to provide assured tap water supply to every rural household by 2024.
#JJM is implemented in partnership with States to ‘improve quality of life’ & enhance ‘ease of living’.
@PMOIndia
@PMOIndia @gssjodhpur
@PMOIndia @gssjodhpur
@PMOIndia @gssjodhpur
@PMOIndia @gssjodhpur
@PMOIndia @gssjodhpur
@PMOIndia @gssjodhpur
@PMOIndia @gssjodhpur
@NITIAayog
With the aim to create a pool of skilled human resource in villages, emphasis on skilling of people in villages to prepare cadre of masons, plumbers, pump operators, fitter, motor mechanics, etc. This will help in creating and managing water supply systems.
@PMOIndia
States/ UTs are working tirelessly to ensure tap water connection to every rural household.
@PMOIndia @gssjodhpur
https://t.co/5NExrzMRbN
Now, 32% of country's rural families have assured tap water supply in homes improving their quality of life & bringing 'ease of living'.
@PMOIndia
26 districts across the country have become #HarGharJal districts, i.e. every rural household in the district has assured tap water supply in their home.
@PMOIndia @gssjodhpur
More from Politics
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".