Think about the Dec 21, 2017 Executive Order signed by @potus

Blocked
property of persons involved in serious human rights abuse or corruption

One month Before @potus signed this EO Saudi King had Prince Alwaleed bin Talal (aka Prince Dopey) arrested. He was told he had to

Exchange his billions for his freedom but he had a small problem. The US Gov froze his assets ($6 billion) and he remained A prisoner. He was interrogated (maybe a little more than interrogation but who cares he’s a monster) and some believe Black Water was involved in the
interrogation. This occurred around 11/4/17. As a result of the interrogation he squealed like the pig he is and gave up valuable intel on Soros, the Clintons, the deep state and creeps like Adam Schiff.

Notice Q’s drops after Dopey was arrested. January 27 2018 Q mentions
Time to play - Black Forest

Immediately the deep state knew Prince dopey must have blabbed his mouth about the horrific games the Rothschilds, “royalty”, Schiff, Clintons, Hussein like to play in the Black Forest in Austria with children. Look it up if ur not familiar
Q points out a week or so later that The mere mention of Black Forest by Q resulted in the Rothschilds dumping their Black Forest estate in a fire sale

Why? Because of @potus Dec 2017 EO. They knew If @potus could get the King of SA to arrest and interrogate and divest his
own nephew of $6 billion for his crimes against the US, children and his buying off US pols, then @potus was coming after the Roths estate in the Black Forest where they engaged in horrific crimes against children.

Dopey was freed after he spilled the goods on the Roths
and Soros.

Soros freaked out and transferred billions of his personal wealth into his nonprofits while Roths sold off their Black Forest estate. After seeing what @potus did to Dopey they thought they were next.

They tried to warn @potus to stay away by causing the stock
To tank by 666 points right around the time Q was posting Q post 666. They tried to send a message to @potus that they control the word economy
@potus obtained the goods on the deep state when Dopey’s servers were captured and he was interrogated.

What’s my point?

@potus could have done to Soros, Roths, Clintons and Hussein what he did to Dopey in late 2017 and early 2018 under that December 2017 EO. He didn’t.
Why? Because he knew the time was not yet right. He knew the public was not yet awake to the crimes of the deep state. He knew the stage was not yet set. Think of all that has happened since that date.

Fast forward to today. The stage is now set for @potus to execute under that
EO against the deep state. Patriots are in control. Nothing can stop what is about to happen.

More from Politics

We’ve been getting calls and outreach from Queens residents all day about this.

The community’s response? Outrage.


Amazon is a billion-dollar company. The idea that it will receive hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks at a time when our subway is crumbling and our communities need MORE investment, not less, is extremely concerning to residents here.

When we talk about bringing jobs to the community, we need to dig deep:
- Has the company promised to hire in the existing community?
- What’s the quality of jobs + how many are promised? Are these jobs low-wage or high wage? Are there benefits? Can people collectively bargain?

Displacement is not community development. Investing in luxury condos is not the same thing as investing in people and families.

Shuffling working class people out of a community does not improve their quality of life.

We need to focus on good healthcare, living wages, affordable rent. Corporations that offer none of those things should be met w/ skepticism.

It’s possible to establish economic partnerships w/ real opportunities for working families, instead of a race-to-the-bottom competition.

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?