Decided to check out what was happening on parler regarding SCOTUS, their website is a horrific design mess, but it is interesting...

Searching the Parlor gutter for SCOTUS gold #2

This website makes me appreciate the beauty of Twitter, it's a hobgoblin of bad design that you have zero search options for!
Swimming the cesspool of Parler for SCOTUS takes #3

Seriously, this trash website will be dead in 2 years @RemindMe_OfThis
Mining the river for golden Parler SCOTUS takes #4

Apparently this theory of SCOTUS leaving the door open is quite popular (its entirely nonsense).

Also PARLER CENSORED ME!!! lmao
Frittering away my time in the tears of the right wing by finding Parler SCOTUS takes #5

Wanted to add at least on little troll into the mix! (they are all over)

Also, hashtags are literally 75% of the "parlays".
Mining my way through the muck of Parler to find SCOTUS takes #6

Milo is talking dirty to me, and I love it!

Lots of talk of the military and civil war (I dont think they realize that if they try the later, the former will crush them)
Threading the needle through the weave of nonsense that is Parler to find SCOTUS takes #7

Well, they do have an astrologer on their side, and an eclipse is coming, I'm more worried about that than their lawsuits TBH.

I think I've hit the insurrection part of the evening
Sinking into the mire of Parler to find SCOTUS takes #8

Definingly more insurrection talk, lots of Jesusland talk...

Maybe pictures drawn in sharpies would've been the way to go...
Sipping the tears of patriots on Parler to find SCOTUS takes #9

Also, lots of talk about how the constitution is null and void. And here I was thinking the Democrats were the ones that were going to kill it!

Love the "did they swear on a dictionary" line!
Slicing through the salami that is Parler to find SCOTUS takes #10

And now we are on to the "blame the founding fathers" part of the night
Limping through the MAGA minefield to find Parler SCOTUS takes #11

There is a 70/30 mixture of "REVOLUTION" and "TRUST THE PLAN" respectively...
Gonna call this thread at an even #12.

I think I need a glass of wine now.

Or maybe champagne?

More from Politics

Here we go. Tag 4 des Impeachments. Trumps Verteidigung.


Es wird argumentiert, dass Trump nur habe sicherstellen wollen, dass die Wahl fair abgelaufen sei. Die Verteidigung zeigt Clips einzelner Demokraten, die der Zertifizierung von Trumps Stimmen 2016 widersprechen. (Dass es 2016 keinen von Obama gesandten Mob aufs Kapitol gab?Egal!)

Die intellektuelle Unehrlichkeit ist so unfassbar, ich weiß kaum, wo ich hier überhaupt anfangen soll; so viele fucking Strohmänner auf einmal.

Die Verteidigung spielt random Clips, in denen Demokraten “fight” sagen, fast zehn Minuten lang. Weil Trump 20mal am 6. Januar “fight” gesagt hat. Dies ist kein Witz. Komisch, dass sonst die Folge nie war, dass ein Mob das Kapitol gestürmt hat und Pence hängen wollte


“Dieser Fall geht um politischen Hass” Ich mein, ja. “Die House Managers hassen Donald Trump.”

So close.

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
1. Project 1742 (EcoHealth/DTRA)
Risks of bat-borne zoonotic diseases in Western Asia

Duration: 24/10/2018-23 /10/2019

Funding: $71,500
@dgaytandzhieva
https://t.co/680CdD8uug


2. Bat Virus Database
Access to the database is limited only to those scientists participating in our ‘Bats and Coronaviruses’ project
Our intention is to eventually open up this database to the larger scientific community
https://t.co/mPn7b9HM48


3. EcoHealth Alliance & DTRA Asking for Trouble
One Health research project focused on characterizing bat diversity, bat coronavirus diversity and the risk of bat-borne zoonotic disease emergence in the region.
https://t.co/u6aUeWBGEN


4. Phelps, Olival, Epstein, Karesh - EcoHealth/DTRA


5, Methods and Expected Outcomes
(Unexpected Outcome = New Coronavirus Pandemic)