As some people question based on inadequate understanding & stereotypes, I'll write a longer blog explaining it later. Now, 🧵to explain briefly. Key to understanding is that science as we know it is a SUBSET of REASON... they are not one & the same. 1/n

A parallel using statistics to explain: Consider a simple regression (w/ figure below) y=b0+b1*x+e, x is a variable explaining outcome y while e is "unexplained part of variation in y", often incorrectly called "error term". 2/n
Key point #1: JUST BCOS ONE CAN'T EXPLAIN THE "e" IN THE REGRESSION DOESN'T MEAN THAT IT DOESN'T EXIST. Does recognizing that "e" is unexplained part of y, but it does exist, imply superstition? No!! Read on as I connect this to life, scientific temper & Vedic rituals. 3/n
What's essence of "science as we know it"? Replicability! Scientific experiments must be replicable. Can you replicate what you can't measure? No! So, replicability needs measurement, which needs observation using 1 or more of 5 senses, which is the "explained part" x below 4/n
Key point #2: "x" IN A REGRESSION CORRESPONDS IN LIFE TO WHAT CAN BE OBSERVED USING ONE OR MORE OF THE FIVE SENSES. 5/n
Now combine Key points #1 & #2. What can be observed/perceived using 1 or more of the five senses is not the ONLY part of what exists life. Or, just bcos you can't observe/perceive something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. 6/n
Our Rishis had the phenomenal understanding that limiting our life experience to only what is observed/perceived using the 5 senses is v limiting. The REASON behind many Vedic rituals got lost over time. We threw away the banana & kept the banana peel, which is slippery. 7/n
As the Rishis left this wealth of knowledge in our Vedic literature, those who have made the effort to read & understand this literature have experienced the pleasure & benefits of eating the banana instead of only seeing the banana peel. 8/n
Understand as follows: If one gets a better understanding that y can be explained better using one more variable z that is a "proxy" for something unobserved/unexplained (apart from observed x), the R-squared (=part of y that is explained) goes up. 9/n
Another parallel using Linear Algebra: Think of "perceiving" an n-dimensional object using a space of only m (m
If I project a 3-d object on the floor I see an image. If I project it on the wall, I see a different projection/image. Just bcos I'm limited by the 2 dimensions of wall or floor, does the 3-d object not exist? Is recognizing the limitations of perception "superstition"? 11/n
Using this 3-d example, now return back to the n-dimension object & m
Finally, read this speech by none other than Swami Vivekananda, where he explains many of the deeper concepts that our Rishis understood v well. A framework where why u r born where u r born is taken as a lottery is no framework whatsoever. 13/n https://t.co/Ccr4QOWqx6
If where u r born (to what kind of parents), which determines sooo much of life's outcomes, is thought to be a LOTTERY, is that even a framework??? It is not as "Anything goes" is not much of a theory!!! Vedic literature doesn't have "Anything goes" as the framework of life! 14/n
If one falls prey to stereotypes, one can neither recognize nor appreciate deep concepts. THINK using this thread, which is what our Upanishads exhort a human being to do. End of 🧵 n/n

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.