$NMDC.NSE Ready to 🚀🚀
@Stocktwits
@Caniravkaria
@puretechnicals9
More from Nmdc
#NMDC the first targets done. 25% in one trading week. If the stocks breaks today low, watch out. A move above todays high - bigger targets open up.
#NMDC the stock is at supports. A clean break out above 160, this could do well. My stops on this one could be 148, if the break out get triggered#Dare2DRM #Watchlist pic.twitter.com/pGG7qj5IhP
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) May 1, 2021
NMDC from 154 to 178..up 16%...next major resistance at 200
NMDC (cmp154) has broken 7 years of falling resistance line supply zone with strong volumes ...140 strong support zone looks good in short to medium term
— Ashish Chaturmohta (@AshishChatur) April 30, 2021
China is discouraging exports, looking to support domestic demand while restricting supply to reduce emissions. pic.twitter.com/lrfHdOiZXx
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
