#Nifty near its weekly 108ema {15300) last time that was tested was back in Sept 2020 which then led to a very strong rally. For now, lets see if it holds and gives a bounce (reversal can be reviewed later)
More from Niftylongterm
Nifty 50-Until 16600 is crossed then there is every chance of one more leg downwards (Wave5)
If it closes below 15700 then we can see 15500/15160
5th wave-can get truncated,
Get rid of kachra!!
Good opportunity to accumulate quality companies
chart👇
cheers https://t.co/b0M5QRcq7e
If it closes below 15700 then we can see 15500/15160
5th wave-can get truncated,
Get rid of kachra!!
Good opportunity to accumulate quality companies
chart👇
cheers https://t.co/b0M5QRcq7e
Please use the opportunity to move out of the low-quality companies into high-quality companies.
— Moneyspinners - Work Hard, Dream Big!! (@Jai0409) May 18, 2022
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
